Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29502310›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body

Sheng-Chieh Chan, Chih-Hua Yeh, Tzu-Chen Yen, Shu-Hang Ng, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang, Chien-Yu Lin, Tsang Yen-Ming, Kang-Hsing Fan, Bing-Shen Huang, Cheng-Lung Hsu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prognostic utility ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Trial
  4. Clinical PET/MR.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Precision matters: the value of PET/CT and PET/MRI in the clinical management of cervical cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  8. Application ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role ofCancers · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Head and neck MRI-based T stage and [European radiology · 2023
    Article
  16. International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheng-Chieh ChanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Chih-Hua YehDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tzu-Chen YenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Shu-Hang NgDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. shuhangng@gmail.com.
Joseph Tung-Chieh ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chien-Yu LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tsang Yen-MingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Kang-Hsing FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Bing-Shen HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Lung HsuDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Kai-Ping ChangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hung-Ming WangDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chun-Ta LiaoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TW

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou CMRPG 2E0191Ministry of Science and Technology 102-2314-B-182A-096Ministry of Science and Technology 104-2314-B-182A-084-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoth head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) play a crucial role in the staging of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In this study, we sought to prospectively investigate the clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for primary staging of NPC patients.

methodsWe examined 113 patients with histologically confirmed NPC who underwent pretreatment, simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI and PET/CT for primary tumor staging. The images obtained with the different imaging modalities were interpreted independently and compared with each other.

resultsPET/MRI increased the accuracy of head and neck MRI for assessment of primary tumor extent in four patients via addition of FDG uptake information to increase the conspicuity of morphologically subtle lesions. PET/MR images were more discernible than PET/CT images for mapping tumor extension, especially intracranial invasion. Regarding the N staging assessment, the sensitivity of PET/MRI (99.5%) was higher than that of head and neck MRI (94.2%) and PET/CT (90.9%). PET/MRI was particularly useful for distinguishing retropharyngeal nodal metastasis from adjacent nasopharyngeal tumors. For distant metastasis evaluation, PET/MRI exhibited a similar sensitivity (90% vs. 86.7% vs. 83.3%), but higher positive predictive value (93.1% vs. 78.8% vs. 83.3%) than whole-body MRI and PET/CT, respectively.

conclusionsFor tumor staging of NPC, simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI was more accurate than head and neck MRI and PET/CT, and may serve as a single-step staging modality.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsHead and neck cancerMRINasopharyngeal carcinomaPETSimultaneous PET/MRITumor staging

Identifiers

PMID29502310
OpenAlexW2791408578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.