ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018
Combined Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors Improve Cardiac and Vascular Function Via Increased NO Bioavailability in Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of early in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan on left ventricular reverse remodelling in acute heart failure.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Trial
- Sacubitril/Valsartan Fails to Ameliorate Cisplatin-Induced Cognitive Impairment.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Inflammasomes as Potential Therapeutic Targets to Prevent Chronic Active Viral Myocarditis-Translating Basic Science into Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Dysregulated ProteinCirculation research · 2025Article
- Determining optimal pretreatment in cardiac surgery: an experimental study.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Sacubitril/valsartan fails to prevent doxorubicin-induced cognitive impairment and hippocampal oxidative, inflammatory, and apoptotic alterations in rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Vascular Endothelial Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Randomized Controlled Trial.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- LCZ696, an Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor, Ameliorates Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetic C57BL/6 Mice.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2024Article
- Possible role of LCZ696 in atherosclerosis: new inroads and perspective.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2024Review
- Early Renal Denervation Attenuates Cardiac Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review of the literature on CD10: its function, clinical application, and prospects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- The protective effect of LCZ696 in coxsackievirus B3-induced acute viral myocarditis mice.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Review
- Sacubitril/valsartan: research progress of multi-channel therapy for cardiorenal syndrome.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Sacubitril/valsartan in Heart Failure and Beyond-From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Relevance.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Myocardial Fatigue: a Mechano-energetic Concept in Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Impact of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition on vascular function in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A pilot study.Physiological reports · 2022Article
- Cardioprotective effects of early intervention with sacubitril/valsartan on pressure overloaded rat hearts.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Acute pulmonary pressure change after transition to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Sacubitril-valsartan improves conduit vessel function and functional capacity and reduces inflammation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a paucity of data about the mechanisms by which sacubitril/valsartan (also known as LCZ696) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure. Specifically, the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on vascular function and NO bioavailability have not been investigated. We hypothesized that sacubitril/valsartan therapy increases circulating NO levels and improves vascular function in the setting of heart failure. METHODS AND
resultsMale spontaneously hypertensive rats underwent myocardial ischemia/reperfusion surgery to induce heart failure and were followed for up to 12 weeks with serial echocardiography. Rats received sacubitril/valsartan (68 mg/kg), valsartan (31 mg/kg), or vehicle starting at 4 weeks after reperfusion. At 8 or 12 weeks of reperfusion, animals were euthanized and tissues were collected for ex vivo analyses of NO bioavailability, aortic vascular reactivity, myocardial and vascular histology, and cardiac molecular assays. Left ventricular structure and function were improved by both valsartan and sacubitril/valsartan compared with vehicle. Sacubitril/valsartan resulted in superior cardiovascular benefits, as evidenced by sustained improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic pressure. Ex vivo vascular function, as measured by aortic vasorelaxation responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside, was significantly improved by valsartan and sacubitril/valsartan, with more sustained improvements afforded by sacubitril/valsartan. Furthermore, myocardial NO bioavailability was significantly enhanced in animals receiving sacubitril/valsartan therapy.
conclusionsSacubitril/valsartan offers superior cardiovascular protection in heart failure and improves vascular function to a greater extent than valsartan alone. Sacubitril/valsartan-mediated improvements in cardiac and vascular function are likely related to increases in NO bioavailability and explain, in part, the benefits beyond angiotensin receptor blockade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.