Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29502095›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2018

Impact and acceptability of self-consent procedures for the school-based human papillomavirus vaccine: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Suzanne Audrey, Harriet Batista Ferrer, Joanne Ferrie, Karen Evans, Michael Bell, Julie Yates, Marion Roderick, John MacLeod, Matthew Hickman

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adolescent HPV vaccination: empowerment, equity and ethics.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Suzanne AudreyPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Harriet Batista FerrerPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5639-0955
Joanne FerrieScreening and Immunisations South West, Public Health England, Bristol, UK.
Karen EvansHead of School Nursing (South Gloucestershire) and Specialist Nursing Services, South Gloucestershire, UK.
Michael BellBristol Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR CLAHRC West, Bristol, UK.
Julie YatesScreening and Immunisations South West, Public Health England, Bristol, UK.
Marion RoderickDepartment of Paediatric Immunology, Bristol Children's Hospital, Bristol, UK.
John MacLeodPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Matthew HickmanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBPublic Health England · GBBristol Royal Hospital for Children · GBNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre · GBSouth Gloucestershire Council · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation MR/KO232331/1Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health PB-PG-0416-20013Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, administered in early adolescence, can substantially reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality. However, lack of written parental consent is a key reason why some young women do not receive the vaccine. The national legal framework allows girls to be vaccinated without parental consent provided they are deemed Gillick competent, but there is some reticence about vaccinating without written parental consent. Self-consent procedures are being implemented in Bristol and South Gloucestershire. This study will examine the implementation, acceptability and impact of these new procedures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Statistical analyses of routine data from Public Health England and the Child Health Information System will test if there has been an increase in HPV vaccination uptake in two ways: (a) Is there an increase when comparing before and after the change in our intervention sites? and (b) Does the percentage change in our intervention sites differ from comparison sites (similar to our intervention sites in terms of initial HPV uptake, ethnicity and deprivation levels) in England where no such intervention took place and how? For the process evaluation, we will develop a logic model and use questionnaires, observations and audio-recorded interviews with young women, school nurses, school staff and parents to examine the context, implementation of self-consent and response to the new procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee and the National Health Service Health Research Authority provided approvals for the study. We will produce a report with recommendations about self-consent procedures in conjunction with key stakeholders. At least two papers will be written for publication in peer-reviewed journals and for conference presentations. A summary of results will be shared with participating immunisation nurses, school staff, young people and parents as requested. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN49086105; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Informed Consent By MinorsAdolescentChildEnglandFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParental ConsentResearch DesignSchool Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccineshealth policysexual medicine

Identifiers

PMID29502095
PMCPMC5879539
OpenAlexW2792107707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.