Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29502041›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2018

Computational linguistic analysis applied to a semantic fluency task to measure derailment and tangentiality in schizophrenia.

Luca Pauselli, Brooke Halpern, Sean D Cleary, Benson S Ku, Michael A Covington, Michael T Compton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Trajectories through semantic spaces in schizophrenia and the relationship to ripple bursts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luca PauselliDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: pausell@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Brooke HalpernDepartment of Psychiatry, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Sean D ClearyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Benson S KuHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Michael A CovingtonCovington Innovations, Athens, GA, USA.
Michael T ComptonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USHofstra University · USLenox Hill Hospital · USMilken Institute · US

Funding

Applying Computational Linguistics to Fundamental Components of SchizophreniaR21MH097999 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COMPTON, MICHAEL T · 2013 to 2014
$442k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH097999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although rating scales to assess formal thought disorder exist, there are no objective, high-reliability instruments that can quantify and track it. This proof-of-concept study shows that CoVec, a new automated tool, is able to differentiate between controls and patients with schizophrenia with derailment and tangentiality. According to ratings from the derailment and tangentiality items of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, we divided the sample into three groups: controls, patients without formal thought disorder, and patients with derailment/tangentiality. Their lists of animals produced during a one-minute semantic fluency task were processed using CoVec, a newly developed software that measures the semantic similarity of words based on vector semantic analysis. CoVec outputs were Mean Similarity, Coherence, Coherence-5, and Coherence-10. Patients with schizophrenia produced fewer words than controls. Patients with derailment had a significantly lower mean number of words and lower Coherence-5 than controls and patients without derailment. Patients with tangentiality had significantly lower Coherence-5 and Coherence-10 than controls and patients without tangentiality. Despite the small samples of patients with clinically apparent thought disorder, CoVec was able to detect subtle differences between controls and patients with either or both of the two forms of disorganization.

Indexed as

LinguisticsProof of Concept StudySchizophrenic PsychologySemanticsThinkingAdultCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSchizophreniaYoung AdultAutomatic Data ProcessingFormal Thought DisorderPsychosisSchizophreniaSemantic Fluency TasksSemantics

Identifiers

PMID29502041
PMCPMC6048590
OpenAlexW2789706137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.