Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29501779›Full record

Trial reportBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2018

Phase II Trial of High-Dose Gemcitabine/Busulfan/Melphalan with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Primary Refractory or Poor-Risk Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Yago Nieto, Peter F Thall, Junsheng Ma, Benigno C Valdez, Sairah Ahmed, Paolo Anderlini, Uday Popat, Roy B Jones, Elizabeth J Shpall, Chitra Hosing and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yago NietoDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: ynieto@mdanderson.org.
Peter F ThallDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Junsheng MaDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Benigno C ValdezDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sairah AhmedDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Paolo AnderliniDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Uday PopatDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Roy B JonesDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Elizabeth J ShpallDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Chitra HosingDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Muzaffar QazilbashDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Partow KebriaeiDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Amin AlousiDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Melissa TimmonsDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Alison GulbisDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Alan MyersDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Yasuhiro OkiDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Michelle FanaleDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Bouthaina DabajaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Chelsea PinnixDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sarah MilgromDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Richard ChamplinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Borje S AnderssonDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a prospective phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, busulfan and melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with primary refractory or poor-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (ie, extranodal relapse or within 1 year of frontline therapy). The trial was powered to detect an improvement in 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) from a historical 50% using a BEAM regimen (carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan) to 65%. We compared the study population with all other concurrent patients who were eligible for the trial but instead received the BEAM regimen at our center. No patient received post-ASCT maintenance therapy. The Gem/Bu/Mel trial enrolled 80 patients with a median age of 31 years, 41% with primary refractory HL and 59% with relapsed HL (36% extranodal relapses), and 30% with positron emission tomography (PET)-positive lesions at ASCT. The concurrent BEAM (n = 45) and Gem/Bu/Mel cohorts were well balanced except for higher rates of bulky relapse and PET-positive tumors in the Gem/Bu/Mel cohort. There were no transplantation-related deaths in either cohort. At a median follow-up of 34.5 months (range, 26 to 72 months), Gem/Bu/Mel was associated with better 2-year PFS (65% versus 51%; P = .008) and overall survival (89% versus 73%; P = .0003). In conclusion, our data show that Gem/Bu/Mel is safe, in this nonrandomized comparison yielding improved outcomes compared with a concurrently treated and prognostically matched cohort of patients with primary refractory or poor-risk relapsed HL receiving BEAM.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBusulfanCarmustineCytarabineDeoxycytidineEtoposideGemcitabineHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHodgkin DiseaseHumansMelphalanMiddle AgedSalvage TherapySurvival AnalysisTransplantation, AutologousBusulfanCarmustineCytarabineDeoxycytidineEtoposideGemcitabineMelphalanAutologous stem cell transplantationHigh-dose chemotherapyHodgkin lymphomaPhase II clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID29501779
PMCPMC8212703
OpenAlexW2791798082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.