ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018
Population Turnover in Remote Oceania Shortly after Initial Settlement.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Genomic evidence supports the "long chronology" for the peopling of Sahul.Science advances · 2025Article
- TBH1: 12 000-year-old human skeleton and projectile point shed light on demographics and mortality in Terminal Pleistocene Southeast Asia.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- The impact of human dispersals and local interactions on the genetic diversity of coastal Papua New Guinea over the past 2,500 years.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Urbanization and genetic homogenization in the medieval Low Countries revealed through a ten-century paleogenomic study of the city of Sint-Truiden.Genome biology · 2025Article
- A Post-Mortem Molecular Damage Profile in the Ancient Human Mitochondrial DNA.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Genetic Origins of the Kiritimati Population from Central-Eastern Micronesia.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Pre-processing of paleogenomes: mitigating reference bias and postmortem damage in ancient genome data.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential of dental calculus to shed light on past human migrations in Oceania.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander populations in genomic research.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Review
- Floristic homogenization of South Pacific islands commenced with human arrival.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- The Allen Ancient DNA Resource (AADR) a curated compendium of ancient human genomes.Scientific data · 2024Article
- More than a decade of genetic research on the Denisovans.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Sedimentary biomarkers of human presence and taro cultivation reveal early horticulture in Remote Oceania.Communications earth & environment · 2024Article
- Life histories in Fiji as reconstructed from first millennium CE Sigatoka Sand Dune burials using isotopes.PloS one · 2024Article
- "Feeling at home in Vanuatu": Integration of newcomers from the East during the last millennium.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Evolutionary Origin ofBiomolecules · 2023Article
- Genomic perspectives on human dispersals during the Holocene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Copying fidelity of functional and non-functional features in ni-Vanuatu children: A transmission chain studyPloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancient DNA from Vanuatu and Tonga dating to about 2,900-2,600 years ago (before present, BP) has revealed that the "First Remote Oceanians" associated with the Lapita archaeological culture were directly descended from the population that, beginning around 5000 BP, spread Austronesian languages from Taiwan to the Philippines, western Melanesia, and eventually Remote Oceania. Thus, ancestors of the First Remote Oceanians must have passed by the Papuan-ancestry populations they encountered in New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands with minimal admixture [1]. However, all present-day populations in Near and Remote Oceania harbor >25% Papuan ancestry, implying that additional eastward migration must have occurred. We generated genome-wide data for 14 ancient individuals from Efate and Epi Islands in Vanuatu from 2900-150 BP, as well as 185 present-day individuals from 18 islands. We find that people of almost entirely Papuan ancestry arrived in Vanuatu by around 2300 BP, most likely reflecting migrations a few hundred years earlier at the end of the Lapita period, when there is also evidence of changes in skeletal morphology and cessation of long-distance trade between Near and Remote Oceania [2, 3]. Papuan ancestry was subsequently diluted through admixture but remains at least 80%-90% in most islands. Through a fine-grained analysis of ancestry profiles, we show that the Papuan ancestry in Vanuatu derives from the Bismarck Archipelago rather than the geographically closer Solomon Islands. However, the Papuan ancestry in Polynesia-the most remote Pacific islands-derives from different sources, documenting a third stream of migration from Near to Remote Oceania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.