Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29501063›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2018

Tight glycemic control in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lvlin Chen, Tiangui Li, Fang Fang, Yu Zhang, Andrew Faramand

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Sepsis in children: state-of-the-art treatment.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lvlin ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, No.82, North Section 2, 2nd Ring Road, Jinniu District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610081, China.
Tiangui LiLongquanyi Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Fang FangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, No.82, North Section 2, 2nd Ring Road, Jinniu District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610081, China. tnt1057@gmail.com.
Andrew FaramandUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chengdu University · CNUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81100925National Natural Science Foundation of China 81472361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperglycemia is prevalent in patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to describe the benefits and risks of tight glucose control (TGC) in critically ill children.

methodsA systemic review and meta-analysis of the literature was carried out on randomized controlled trials of TGC in critically ill children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. The databases searched were Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases until May 1, 2017. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. A random-effects model was used to report all outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to quantify absolute effects and quality of evidence. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were hypoglycemia (any, severe), sepsis, new need for dialysis, and seizures.

resultsA total of 4030 patients were included from six studies. All six studies were rated as at low risk of bias. Our meta-analysis showed that TGC did not result in a decrease in risk of hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR), 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-1.45; I

conclusionsAmong critically ill children with hyperglycemia, TGC does not result in a decrease in hospital mortality, but appears to reduce a new need for dialysis. However, TGC is associated with higher incidence of hypoglycemia. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42017074039 .

Indexed as

AdolescentBlood GlucoseChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessGlycemic IndexHospital MortalityHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricPediatricsBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsChildrenHyperglycemiaMortalityRandomized controlled trialTight glycemic control

Identifiers

PMID29501063
PMCPMC5835325
OpenAlexW2794077060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.