Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29500929›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2018

Mapping ligand binding pockets in chloride ClC-1 channels through an integrated in silico and experimental approach using anthracene-9-carboxylic acid and niflumic acid.

C Altamura, G F Mangiatordi, O Nicolotti, D Sahbani, A Farinato, F Leonetti, M R Carratù, D Conte, J-F Desaphy, P Imbrici

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Skeletal muscle ClC-1 chloride channels in health and diseases.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Pathomechanisms of aFrontiers in neurology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C AltamuraDepartment of Pharmacy - Drug Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
G F MangiatordiDepartment of Pharmacy - Drug Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
O NicolottiDepartment of Pharmacy - Drug Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
D SahbaniDepartment of Pharmacy - Drug Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
A FarinatoDepartment of Pharmacy - Drug Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
F LeonettiDepartment of Pharmacy - Drug Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
M R CarratùDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
D ConteDepartment of Pharmacy - Drug Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
J-F DesaphyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.
P ImbriciDepartment of Pharmacy - Drug Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9140-5350
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAlthough chloride channels are involved in several physiological processes and acquired diseases, the availability of compounds selectively targeting CLC proteins is limited. ClC-1 channels are responsible for sarcolemma repolarization after an action potential in skeletal muscle and have been associated with myotonia congenita and myotonic dystrophy as well as with other muscular physiopathological conditions. To date only a few ClC-1 blockers have been discovered, such as anthracene-9-carboxylic acid (9-AC) and niflumic acid (NFA), whereas no activator exists. The absence of a ClC-1 structure and the limited information regarding the binding pockets in CLC channels hamper the identification of improved modulators. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Here we provide an in-depth characterization of drug binding pockets in ClC-1 through an integrated in silico and experimental approach. We first searched putative cavities in a homology model of ClC-1 built upon an eukaryotic CLC crystal structure, and then validated in silico data by measuring the blocking ability of 9-AC and NFA on mutant ClC-1 channels expressed in HEK 293 cells. KEY

resultsWe identified four putative binding cavities in ClC-1. 9-AC appears to interact with residues K231, R421 and F484 within the channel pore. We also identified one preferential binding cavity for NFA and propose R421 and F484 as critical residues. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study represents the first effort to delineate the binding sites of ClC-1. This information is fundamental to discover compounds useful in the treatment of ClC-1-associated dysfunctions and might represent a starting point for specifically targeting other CLC proteins.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMolecular Docking SimulationAnthracenesBinding SitesChloride ChannelsHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsMutationNiflumic Acid9-anthroic acidAnthracenesChloride ChannelsCLC-1 channelLigandsNiflumic Acid

Identifiers

PMID29500929
PMCPMC5913395
OpenAlexW2793863408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.