Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29500694›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2018

[Referral behavior of general physicians for patients with obesity].

F U Jung, C Luck-Sikorski, C Stroh, S G Riedel-Heller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

F U JungIntegriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum (IFB) Adipositas Erkrankungen, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland. franziska.jung@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
C Luck-SikorskiIntegriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum (IFB) Adipositas Erkrankungen, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
C StrohAllgemein‑, Visceral- und Kinderchirurgie, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Deutschland.
S G Riedel-HellerInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Arbeitsmedizin und Public Health, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
IFB Adiposity Diseases · DELeipzig University · DESRH Hochschule für Gesundheit Gera · DESRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity and overweight is constantly rising. Thus, obesity is increasingly considered as one of the most important healthcare problems in Germany. Surgical interventions have been proven to be the only treatment option to achieve sustained weight loss along with a reduction of obesity-related comorbidities in the vast majority of morbidly obese patients. With respect to the small numbers of weight loss surgeries conducted in Germany, several reasons are currently discussed. General practitioners play a very important role in gatekeeping when it comes to decisions about treatment. Research has shown that knowledge and stigma play a role when treatment pathways for patients with obesity are defined. Interventions are required to make treatment decisions by physicians or patients independent of social pressure due to stigma or gaps in expertise.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGeneral PractitionersObesity, MorbidReferral and ConsultationGermanyHumansBariatric surgeryComorbiditiesHealth careLife styleStigmatization

Identifiers

PMID29500694
OpenAlexW2791826479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.