Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29500572›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Rectal E. coli above ciprofloxacin ECOFF associate with infectious complications following prostate biopsy.

Inari Kalalahti, Kaisa Huotari, Kanerva Lahdensuo, Eveliina Tarkka, Henrikki Santti, Antti Rannikko, Anu Pätäri-Sampo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02140502 (Incidence of Fluoroquinolone Resistant Bacteria in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02140502 completednot on this map

Incidence of Fluoroquinolone Resistant Bacteria in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2015 to 2016Enrolled200ConditionsFluoroquinolone Resistant Enteric Bacteria
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phenotypic screening for quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inari KalalahtiDepartment of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. inari.kalalahti@hus.fi.
Kaisa HuotariDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Kanerva LahdensuoDepartment of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Eveliina TarkkaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland.
Henrikki SanttiDepartment of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti RannikkoDepartment of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anu Pätäri-SampoDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Competitive State Research funding TYH2013345 and TYH2015313Finnish Cancer Society (7553Finnish Urological Association 2016 and 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transrectal prostate biopsies carry the risk of infection. By using non-selective culture plates, instead of commonly used ciprofloxacin (CIP)-containing plates, we analyzed the association between Escherichia coli CIP minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and post-biopsy infectious complications. A pre-biopsy rectal swab was taken from 207 consecutive men, scheduled for transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy with CIP 750 mg as the mostly used prophylaxis. CIP MIC of rectal Gram-negative bacilli was determined from a chromogenic agar. Rectal E. coli were categorized to resistant (R) and intermediate (I) isolates together (R + I, MIC > 0.25 mg/l) and to sensitive (S, MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/l) using EUCAST clinical breakpoints. In addition, epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF R, MIC > 0.064 mg/l) was used for categorization. Eighteen (8.7%) men showed CIP R + I E. coli by the EUCAST breakpoints and 41 (19.8%) using the ECOFF R criteria. During follow-up, 15 (7.2%) men had infectious symptoms, of which 9 (4.3%) were culture-confirmed infections. Only 4 (26.7%) of these 15 patients showed R + I E. coli in the rectal swab according to EUCAST, but 10 (66.7%) using the ECOFF cutoff. Rectal E. coli CIP R + I by the EUCAST clinical breakpoints associated with infectious complications with OR 5.7 (95% CI 1.5-21.8, P = 0.005) and ECOFF R E. coli by OR 10.7 (95% CI 3.0-37.6, P < 0.001). Men carrying rectal E. coli with moderately lowered CIP susceptibility (MIC > ECOFF 0.064 mg/l) were identified and, interestingly, they showed a high risk of developing infectious symptoms after the biopsy. This explains why some men develop infectious complications despite appropriate antibiotics before prostatic biopsies.

trial registrationNCT02140502.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCiprofloxacinDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFosfomycinHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedProstateRectumAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinFosfomycinAntibiotic prophylaxisComplicationInfectionProstate biopsy

Identifiers

PMID29500572
OpenAlexW2792504571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.