Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29500555›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2018

Switching Reference Medicines to Biosimilars: A Systematic Literature Review of Clinical Outcomes.

Hillel P Cohen, Andrew Blauvelt, Robert M Rifkin, Silvio Danese, Sameer B Gokhale, Gillian Woollett

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pharmacists' Perspectives of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Relapse of retinal vasculitis after a non-medical biosimilar switch: a case report.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hillel P CohenSandoz Inc., 100 College Road West, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA. hillel.cohen@sandoz.com.
Andrew BlauveltOregon Medical Research Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Robert M RifkinRocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO, USA.
Silvio DaneseIBD Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Sameer B GokhaleNovartis Ltd., Hyderabad, India.
Gillian WoollettAvalere Health, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate the possibility that switching from reference biologic medicines to biosimilars could lead to altered clinical outcomes, including enhanced immunogenicity, compromised safety, or diminished efficacy for patients, a systematic literature review was conducted of all switching studies between related biologics (including biosimilars).

methodsA systematic search was conducted using the Medline

resultsPrimary data were available from 90 studies that enrolled 14,225 unique individuals. They included protein medicines used in supportive care as well as those used as therapeutic agents. The medicines contained seven different molecular entities that were used to treat 14 diseases. The great majority of the publications did not report differences in immunogenicity, safety, or efficacy. The nature and intensity of safety signals reported after switching from reference medicines to biosimilars were the same as those already known from continued use of the reference medicines alone. Three large multiple switch studies with different biosimilars did not show differences in efficacy or safety after multiple switches between reference medicine and biosimilar. Two publications reported a loss of efficacy or increased dropout rates.

conclusionsWhile use of each biologic must be assessed individually, these results provide reassurance to healthcare professionals and the public that the risk of immunogenicity-related safety concerns or diminished efficacy is unchanged after switching from a reference biologic to a biosimilar medicine.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsComputational BiologyDatabases, PharmaceuticalDrug SubstitutionDrug TherapyHumansTreatment OutcomeBiosimilar Pharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID29500555
PMCPMC5854749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.