ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018
Modified laparoscopic pectopexy: short-term follow-up and its effects on sexual function and quality of life.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Mesh Placement Anterior Versus Posterior to the Cervix Uteri in Laparoscopic Pectopexy with Uterine Preservation.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Clinical application of laparoscopic pectopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: efficacy and safety.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Pectopexy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Pectopexy versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of laparoscopic pectopexy with the standard laparoscopic sacropexy for apical prolapse: an exploratory randomized controlled trialJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2023Article
- Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic pectopexy with native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Quality of Life Following Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatments in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- How and on whom to perform uterine-preserving surgery for uterine prolapse.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic pectopexy for patients with intraabdominal adhesions, lumbar spinal procedures, and other contraindications to sacrocolpopexy: a case series.AJOG global reports · 2022Article
- Perioperative and Long-Term Anatomical and Subjective Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension for POP-Q Stages II-IV Apical Prolapse.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Quality of Sexual Life after Native Tissue versus Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic Pectopexy-CUSUM Learning Curve and Perioperative Complications Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic Long Mesh Surgery with Augmented Round Ligaments: A Novel Uterine Preservation Procedure For Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fi xation: a comparative study.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyObservational
- Comparison of the Quality of Life and Female Sexual Function Following Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in Apical Prolapse Patients.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Evaluation of Sexual Function and Vaginal Prolapse Relapse in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic SacropexyIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- G-Mesh for Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A Single-center Evaluation of a Novel Technique for Apical Prolapse Repair.Journal of mid-life healthArticle
- Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Paravaginal Repair after Failed Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis study examined the early outcomes of laparoscopic (LS) pectopexy and evaluated its effects on female sexual function and quality of life (QoL).
methodsTwenty-two patients with apical prolapse who underwent LS pectopexy were included. Outcomes of the procedure were noted; the Female Sexual Function (FSFI) and Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaires were completed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
resultsThere was no evidence of recurrent prolapse or constipation; the percentages of exacerbation of cystocele, rectocele, de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and de novo urgency (UUI) were 4.5%, 9.0%, 4.5%, and 4.5%, respectively (mean follow-up 10.41 months). FSFI and P-QOL scores improved significantly (p < 0.05) postoperatively.
conclusionsLS pectopexy shows promising results for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with comparable outcomes. It also improved the FSFI and P-QOL scores in POP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.