Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29500509›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2018

[Impact of medical TV series on surgical hospital patient's perception of reality].

Kai Witzel, Michael Weitzendorfer, Philip Schredl, Horst J Koch, Cornelia Kaminski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai WitzelChirurgie, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Salzburg, Salzburg, Österreich. kw@micKW.de.
Michael WeitzendorferChirurgie, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Salzburg, Salzburg, Österreich.
Philip SchredlChirurgie, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Salzburg, Salzburg, Österreich.
Horst J KochPsychiatrie, Heinrich-Braun-Klinikum, Zwickau, Deutschland.
Cornelia KaminskiChirurgie, Minimal Invasiv Center, 36088, Hünfeld, Deutschland.
Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DEKlinikum Braunschweig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical TV series are very popular. Media research emphasizes that watching TV has an influence on patient's expectations and estimations concerning upcoming surgery. We analyzed these associations in our own patients. We suspected that reality as presented in the media and the actual reality of hospitals are not always conceived as two different worlds.

methodsOver a 15-month period a standardized questionnaire was used to interview 162 in-house patients who had been admitted for an elective standard operation. They were interviewed 1-2 days prior to surgery and shortly before discharge from hospital. The questions aimed at their social situation and their TV viewing habits with special consideration of medical TV series.

resultsThe knowledge of medical TV series is highly associated with a realistic assessment of these programs (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the knowledge of these programs is correlated with patient's unrealistic estimations of upcoming surgery.

conclusionMedical TV series have a significant influence on surgical in-house patients. Patients with knowledge of many medical TV series believe that the medical setting in these shows is realistic. This can result in false estimations concerning real surgery.

Indexed as

TelevisionElective Surgical ProceduresHumansInpatientsPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesCultivationEffects of mediaMedical TV showsPatient’s expectationTelevision

Identifiers

PMID29500509
OpenAlexW2792968330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.