Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29500474›Full record

Observational studyDer Urologe. Ausg. A2018

[Development and treatment of localized/systemic BCGitis : Retrospective studies in direct comparison to mitomycin C].

W-D U Böhm, R Koch, S Wenzel, M P Wirth, M Toma

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

W-D U BöhmAkademische Lehrpraxis für Urologie, Ärztehaus am Krankenhaus St. Joseph-Stift Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland. dr.wolf-diether.boehm@gmx.de.
R KochInstitut für Biometrie und Medizinische Statistik, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
S WenzelKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
M P WirthKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
M TomaInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · DESt. Joseph-Krankenhaus · DETU Dresden · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adjuvant therapy with different bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) preparations is a well-established guideline-endorsed treatment for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Our observational study demonstrates equality between BCG and mitomycin C (MMC) treatment based on the oncological outcome. However, there were significant toxicity differences with higher rates in the BCG treatment group. The potential adverse effects of BCG in terms of a BCGitis are controversially discussed regarding their occurrence. As such, we sought to retrospectively evaluate the incidence in 106 consecutive patients. The BCG group demonstrated minor adverse effects in 78.4% and major adverse effects in 43.3%-partially coincident. Moreover, the parallel MMC group showed in 34.7% respectively 1.4% adverse events-as expected distinctly lower. In the context of this clinical discussion, we refer to alternative treatment concepts. Our data show a high clinical relevance of the patient's primary comorbidity.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntineoplasticBCG VaccineMitomycinUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBCG VaccineMitomycinBCGitisComorbidityDisease managementNonmuscle invasive bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID29500474
OpenAlexW2794168183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.