Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29500409›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Genomic evidence of speciation reversal in ravens.

Anna M Kearns, Marco Restani, Ildiko Szabo, Audun Schrøder-Nielsen, Jin Ah Kim, Hayley M Richardson, John M Marzluff, Robert C Fleischer, Arild Johnsen, Kevin E Omland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pervasive and recurrent hybridization prevents inbreeding in Europe's most threatened seabird.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The extent of introgression between incipientProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Common misconceptions of speciation.Evolutionary journal of the Linnean Society · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna M KearnsNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway. kearnsa@si.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-7442
Marco RestaniDepartment of Biological Sciences, St. Cloud State University, 720 Fourth Avenue, St. Cloud, MN, 56301-4498, USA.
Ildiko SzaboCowan Tetrapod Collection, Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, 2212 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Audun Schrøder-NielsenNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Jin Ah KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.
Hayley M RichardsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.
John M MarzluffSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Robert C FleischerCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, 20013-7012, DC, USA.
Arild JohnsenNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Kevin E OmlandDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many species, including humans, have emerged via complex reticulate processes involving hybridisation. Under certain circumstances, hybridisation can cause distinct lineages to collapse into a single lineage with an admixed mosaic genome. Most known cases of such 'speciation reversal' or 'lineage fusion' involve recently diverged lineages and anthropogenic perturbation. Here, we show that in western North America, Common Ravens (Corvus corax) have admixed mosaic genomes formed by the fusion of non-sister lineages ('California' and 'Holarctic') that diverged ~1.5 million years ago. Phylogenomic analyses and concordant patterns of geographic structuring in mtDNA, genome-wide SNPs and nuclear introns demonstrate long-term admixture and random interbreeding between the non-sister lineages. In contrast, our genomic data support reproductive isolation between Common Ravens and Chihuahuan Ravens (C. cryptoleucus) despite extensive geographic overlap and a sister relationship between Chihuahuan Ravens and the California lineage. These data suggest that the Common Raven genome was formed by secondary lineage fusion and most likely represents a case of ancient speciation reversal that occurred without anthropogenic causes.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationGenomeGenomicsPhylogenyAnimalsBreedingCrowsDNA, MitochondrialGene FlowGeographyHybridization, GeneticIntronsMosaicismPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproductive IsolationSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID29500409
PMCPMC5834606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.