Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29500184›Full record

ArticleGut2018

IPMNs with co-occurring invasive cancers: neighbours but not always relatives.

Matthäus Felsenstein, Michaël Noë, David L Masica, Waki Hosoda, Peter Chianchiano, Catherine G Fischer, Gemma Lionheart, Lodewijk A A Brosens, Antonio Pea, Jun Yu and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03820531 (DNA-mutation Analysis by Next Generation Sequencing in Cyst Fluid of Suspected Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasia of the Pancreas Obtained by Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03820531 nacompletednot on this map

DNA-mutation Analysis by Next Generation Sequencing in Cyst Fluid of Suspected Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasia of the Pancreas Obtained by Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (ZYSTEUS-Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTheresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbHRan2018 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsPancreas CystArmsNext Generation Sequencing, CEA and lipase, Cytology, Histology of resected pancreas cyst
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dual Role of NRF2 in Pancreatic Precursor Lesions.Cancer research communications · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Remnant pancreatic carcinoma: The current status.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthäus FelsensteinDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michaël NoëDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
David L MasicaInstitute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Waki HosodaDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Peter ChianchianoDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Catherine G FischerDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Gemma LionheartDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lodewijk A A BrosensDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antonio PeaDepartment of Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Jun YuDepartment of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Georgios GemenetzisDepartment of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Vincent P GrootDepartment of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Martin A MakaryDepartment of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jin HeDepartment of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Matthew J WeissDepartment of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
John L CameronDepartment of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Christopher L WolfgangDepartment of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ralph H HrubanDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas J RobertsDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rachel KarchinInstitute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michael G GogginsDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Laura D WoodDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USCancer Research Center · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KERN, SCOTT E · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
Characterization of the Molecular Determinants of High-Grade Dysplasia in Pancreatic Cancer Precursor LesionsK08DK107781 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WOOD, LAURA DELONG · 2016 to 2020
$846k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK107781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are precursor lesions that can give rise to invasive pancreatic carcinoma. Although approximately 8% of patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have a co-occurring IPMN, the precise genetic relationship between these two lesions has not been systematically investigated.

designWe analysed all available patients with co-occurring IPMN and invasive intrapancreatic carcinoma over a 10-year period at a single institution. For each patient, we separately isolated DNA from the carcinoma, adjacent IPMN and distant IPMN and performed targeted next generation sequencing of a panel of pancreatic cancer driver genes. We then used the identified mutations to infer the relatedness of the IPMN and co-occurring invasive carcinoma in each patient.

resultsWe analysed co-occurring IPMN and invasive carcinoma from 61 patients with IPMN/ductal adenocarcinoma as well as 13 patients with IPMN/colloid carcinoma and 7 patients with IPMN/carcinoma of the ampullary region. Of the patients with co-occurring IPMN and ductal adenocarcinoma, 51% were likely related. Surprisingly, 18% of co-occurring IPMN and ductal adenocarcinomas were likely independent, suggesting that the carcinoma arose from an independent precursor. By contrast, all colloid carcinomas were likely related to their associated IPMNs. In addition, these analyses showed striking genetic heterogeneity in IPMNs, even with respect to well-characterised driver genes.

conclusionThis study demonstrates a higher prevalence of likely independent co-occurring IPMN and ductal adenocarcinoma than previously appreciated. These findings have important implications for molecular risk stratification of patients with IPMN.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCarcinoma, PapillaryChromograninsDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenes, p16GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationMutation, MissenseBiomarkers, TumorChromograninsDNA-Binding ProteinsGNAS protein, humanGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GsOncogene ProteinsRNF43 protein, humanSmad4 ProteinUbiquitin-Protein Ligasescancer geneticscarcinogenesismolecular geneticsmutationspancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID29500184
PMCPMC10489026
OpenAlexW2792209856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.