Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29499928›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2018

Exosomes in Cancer Liquid Biopsy: A Focus on Breast Cancer.

Sina Halvaei, Shiva Daryani, Zahra Eslami-S, Tannaz Samadi, Narges Jafarbeik-Iravani, Tayebeh Oghabi Bakhshayesh, Keivan Majidzadeh-A, Rezvan Esmaeili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Exosome: an overview on enhanced biogenesis by small molecules.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sina HalvaeiGenetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Shiva DaryaniGenetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra Eslami-SGenetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Tannaz SamadiGenetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Narges Jafarbeik-IravaniGenetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Tayebeh Oghabi BakhshayeshGenetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Keivan Majidzadeh-AGenetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Rezvan EsmaeiliGenetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: esmaeili.rezvan@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The important challenge about cancer is diagnosis in primary stages and proper treatment. Although classical clinico-pathological features of the tumor have major prognostic value, the advances in diagnosis and treatment are indebted to discovery of molecular biomarkers and control of cancer in the pre-invasive state. Moreover, the efficiency of available therapeutic options is highly diminished, and chemotherapy is still the main treatment due to lack of enough specific targets. Accordingly, finding the new noninvasive biomarkers for cancer is still an important clinical challenge that is not achieved yet. There are current technologies to screen, diagnose, prognose, and treat cancer, but the limitations of these implements and procedures are undeniable. Liquid biopsy as a noninvasive method has a promising future in the field of cancer, and exosomes as one of the recent areas have drawn much attention. In this review, the potential capability of exosomes is summarized in cancer with the special focus on breast cancer as the second cause of cancer mortality in women all around the world. It discusses reasons to choose exosomes for liquid biopsy and the studies related to different potential biomarkers found in the exosomes. Moreover, exosome studies on milk as a specific biofluid are also discussed. At last, because choosing the method for exosome studies is very challenging, a summary of different techniques is provided.

Indexed as

applicationbiofluidbio-fluidsbreast milkclinicalexosomeextracellular vesicles

Identifiers

PMID29499928
PMCPMC5862028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.