ReviewDrug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy2018
New tools for old drugs: Functional genetic screens to optimize current chemotherapy.
Review in Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advantages and research progress of three-dimensional culture systems for lung cancer drug screening (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Individualized Pooled CRISPR/Cas9 Screenings Identify CDK2 as a Druggable Vulnerability in a Canine Mammary Carcinoma Patient.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Docetaxel response in BRCA1,p53-deficient mammary tumor cells is affected by Huntingtin and BAP1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Landscape of human organoids: Ideal model in clinics and research.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Review
- Targeting pan-essential pathways in cancer with cytotoxic chemotherapy: challenges and opportunities.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2023Review
- Antimetastatic Activity of Apoptolidin A by Upregulation of N-Myc Downstream-Regulated Gene 1 Expression in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Global cluster analysis and network visualization in organoids in cancer research: a scientometric mapping from 1991 to 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- CRISPR screens guide the way for PARP and ATR inhibitor biomarker discovery.The FEBS journal · 2022Review
- Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Dissecting Molecular Phenotypes Through FACS-Based Pooled CRISPR Screens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Radachlorin-Containing Microparticles for Photodynamic Therapy.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2021Article
- The effectiveness of an independent anti-neoplastic medication therapy management system in ambulatory cancer patients.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Cytotoxic Mechanism of Sphaerodactylomelol, an Uncommon Bromoditerpene Isolated fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Farnesoid X receptor activation induces antitumour activity in colorectal cancer by suppressing JAK2/STAT3 signalling via transactivation of SOCS3 gene.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Genome-wide CRISPR screens of oral squamous cell carcinoma reveal fitness genes in the Hippo pathway.eLife · 2020Article
- The Effect of Resveratrol or Curcumin on Head and Neck Cancer Cells Sensitivity to the Cytotoxic Effects of Cisplatin.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Pooled Screens IdentifyMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020Article
- Cisplatin exposure causes c-Myc-dependent resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition in HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cell death & disease · 2019Article
- From yeast to humans: Understanding the biology of DNA Damage Response (DDR) kinases.Genetics and molecular biology · 2019Article
- Co-delivery of dihydroartemisinin and docetaxel in pH-sensitive nanoparticles for treating metastatic breast cancerRSC advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in the treatment of various cancers, many patients still receive anti-cancer therapies that hardly eradicate tumor cells but inflict considerable side effects. To provide the best treatment regimen for an individual patient, a major goal in molecular oncology is to identify predictive markers for a personalized therapeutic strategy. Regarding novel targeted anti-cancer therapies, there are usually good markers available. Unfortunately, however, targeted therapies alone often result in rather short remissions and little cytotoxic effect on the cancer cells. Therefore, classical chemotherapy with frequent long remissions, cures, and a clear effect on cancer cell eradication remains a corner stone in current anti-cancer therapy. Reliable biomarkers which predict the response of tumors to classical chemotherapy are rare, in contrast to the situation for targeted therapy. For the bulk of cytotoxic therapeutic agents, including DNA-damaging drugs, drugs targeting microtubules or antimetabolites, there are still no reliable biomarkers used in the clinic to predict tumor response. To make progress in this direction, meticulous studies of classical chemotherapeutic drug action and resistance mechanisms are required. For this purpose, novel functional screening technologies have emerged as successful technologies to study chemotherapeutic drug response in a variety of models. They allow a systematic analysis of genetic contributions to a drug-responsive or -sensitive phenotype and facilitate a better understanding of the mode of action of these drugs. These functional genomic approaches are not only useful for the development of novel targeted anti-cancer drugs but may also guide the use of classical chemotherapeutic drugs by deciphering novel mechanisms influencing a tumor's drug response. Moreover, due to the advances of 3D organoid cultures from patient tumors and in vivo screens in mice, these genetic screens can be applied using conditions that are more representative of the clinical setting. Patient-derived 3D organoid lines furthermore allow the characterization of the "essentialome", the specific set of genes required for survival of these cells, of an individual tumor, which could be monitored over the course of treatment and help understanding how drug resistance evolves in clinical tumors. Thus, we expect that these functional screens will enable the discovery of novel cancer-specific vulnerabilities, and through clinical validation, move the field of predictive biomarkers forward. This review focuses on novel advanced techniques to decipher the interplay between genetic alterations and drug response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.