ArticleBMC research notes2018
Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain.
Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02540343 (Intercultural Adaptation and Validation of the "Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire"-Translation and Validation of a Questionnaire), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intercultural Adaptation and Validation of the "Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire"-Translation and Validation of a Questionnaire
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cultural Adaptation and Structural Validation of the Short-Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire in Peruvian Nurses with Musculoskeletal Symptoms.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Translation, validation, and reliability of Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire in Nepali.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of Urdu Version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Hypervigilance to Pain May Predict the Transition from Subacute to Chronic Back Pain: A Longitudinal Observational Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- A multisite validation of brain white matter pathways of resilience to chronic back pain.eLife · 2024Article
- Corticostriatal circuits in the transition to chronic back pain: The predictive role of reward learning.Cell reports. Medicine · 2022Article
- Development and external validation of a prediction model for patient-relevant outcomes in patients with chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo validate the German version of OMPSQ (OMPSQ-G) for patients with chronic neck pain.
resultsAfter translating OMPSQ to German, we assessed the discriminant validity between patients and healthy adults. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients between domains of OMPSQ-G and the German version of neck disability index (NDI-G) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck pain intensity. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, test-retest and relative reliability were assessed. Fifty patients with chronic neck pain (mean age, 43.6 years; 34 females) and 24 healthy adults (mean age, 50.4 years; 18 females) participated. Mann-Whitney U tests showed significant differences in OMPSQ scores between both groups at the baseline (z = - 4.6; p < 0.001) and second time point (z = - 4.8; p < 0.001). OMPSQ-G scores highly and moderately correlated with NDI-G (ρ = 0.70) and VAS (ρ = 0.41) scores, respectively. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. OMPSQ-G showed high reliability (intraclass correlation 2.1: 0.93; standard error of measurement, 6.9; smallest detectable change, 20 points). The Bland-Altman plot indicated no systematic error. OMPSQ-G showed good validity and reliability in patients with neck pain. Trial registration NCT02540343.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.