Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29499753›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain.

Anke Langenfeld, Carolien Bastiaenen, Florian Brunner, Jaap Swanenburg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02540343 (Intercultural Adaptation and Validation of the "Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire"-Translation and Validation of a Questionnaire), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02540343 completednot on this map

Intercultural Adaptation and Validation of the "Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire"-Translation and Validation of a Questionnaire

TypeobservationalSponsorBalgrist University HospitalRan2014 to 2016Enrolled90ConditionsNeck PainArmsquestionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Anke LangenfeldInterdisciplinary Spinal Research ISR, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. anke.langenfeld@balgrist.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-4289
Carolien BastiaenenCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Florian BrunnerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rheumatology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jaap SwanenburgInterdisciplinary Spinal Research ISR, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maastricht University · NLUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo validate the German version of OMPSQ (OMPSQ-G) for patients with chronic neck pain.

resultsAfter translating OMPSQ to German, we assessed the discriminant validity between patients and healthy adults. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients between domains of OMPSQ-G and the German version of neck disability index (NDI-G) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck pain intensity. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, test-retest and relative reliability were assessed. Fifty patients with chronic neck pain (mean age, 43.6 years; 34 females) and 24 healthy adults (mean age, 50.4 years; 18 females) participated. Mann-Whitney U tests showed significant differences in OMPSQ scores between both groups at the baseline (z = - 4.6; p < 0.001) and second time point (z = - 4.8; p < 0.001). OMPSQ-G scores highly and moderately correlated with NDI-G (ρ = 0.70) and VAS (ρ = 0.41) scores, respectively. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. OMPSQ-G showed high reliability (intraclass correlation 2.1: 0.93; standard error of measurement, 6.9; smallest detectable change, 20 points). The Bland-Altman plot indicated no systematic error. OMPSQ-G showed good validity and reliability in patients with neck pain. Trial registration NCT02540343.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainNeck PainPain MeasurementReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChronicNeck painOMPSQValidation

Identifiers

PMID29499753
PMCPMC5833147
OpenAlexW2796514034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.