Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29499749›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

Barriers, supports, and effective interventions for uptake of human papillomavirus- and other vaccines within global and Canadian Indigenous peoples: a systematic review protocol.

Kelly J Mrklas, Shannon MacDonald, Melissa A Shea-Budgell, Nancy Bedingfield, Heather Ganshorn, Sarah Glaze, Lea Bill, Bonnie Healy, Chyloe Healy, Juliet Guichon and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Highlighting strengths and resources that increase ownership of cervical cancer screening for Indigenous communities in Northern British Columbia: Community-driven approaches.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Barriers to adult vaccination in Canada: A qualitative systematic review.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelly J MrklasResearch Innovation and Analytics, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.
Shannon MacDonaldFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Melissa A Shea-BudgellArnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Nancy BedingfieldDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Heather GanshornHealth Sciences Library, Libraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Sarah GlazeDepartment of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Lea BillAlberta First Nations Information Governance Centre, Calgary, Canada.
Bonnie HealyAlberta First Nations Information Governance Centre, Calgary, Canada.
Chyloe HealyAlberta First Nations Information Governance Centre, Calgary, Canada.
Juliet GuichonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Amy ColquhounAnalytics and Performance Reporting Branch, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Canada.
Christopher BellAnalytics and Performance Reporting Branch, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Canada.
Ruth RichardsonHealth Canada First Nations and Inuit Health Branch, Edmonton, Canada.
Rita HendersonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
James KellnerDepartment of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Cheryl BarnabeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Robert A BednarczykHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Angeline LetendreAlberta Cancer Prevention Legacy Fund, Edmonton, Canada.
Gregg S NelsonArnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. gsnelson@ucalgary.ca.
University of Calgary · CABlue Quills First Nations College · CAAlberta Health · CAAlberta Cancer Foundation · CAEmory University · USFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba · CAInstitute of Cancer Research · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Alberta Innovates 201500852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the existence of human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines with demonstrated safety and effectiveness and funded HPV vaccination programs, coverage rates are persistently lower and cervical cancer burden higher among Canadian Indigenous peoples. Barriers and supports to HPV vaccination in Indigenous peoples have not been systematically documented, nor have interventions to increase uptake in this population. This protocol aims to appraise the literature in Canadian and global Indigenous peoples, relating to documented barriers and supports to vaccination and interventions to increase acceptability/uptake or reduce hesitancy of vaccination. Although HPV vaccination is the primary focus, we anticipate only a small number of relevant studies to emerge from the search and will, therefore, employ a broad search strategy to capture literature related to both HPV vaccination and vaccination in general in global Indigenous peoples.

methodsEligible studies will include global Indigenous peoples and discuss barriers or supports and/or interventions to improve uptake or to reduce hesitancy, for the HPV vaccine and/or other vaccines. Primary outcomes are documented barriers or supports or interventions. All study designs meeting inclusion criteria will be considered, without restricting by language, location, or data type. We will use an a priori search strategy, comprised of key words and controlled vocabulary terms, developed in consultation with an academic librarian, and reviewed by a second academic librarian using the PRESS checklist. We will search several electronic databases from date of inception, without restrictions. A pre-defined group of global Indigenous websites will be reviewed for relevant gray literature. Bibliographic searches will be conducted for all included studies to identify relevant reviews. Data analysis will include an inductive, qualitative, thematic synthesis and a quantitative analysis of measured barriers and supports, as well as a descriptive synthesis and quantitative summary of measures for interventions. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this study will contribute the first systematic review of documented barriers, supports, and interventions for vaccination in general and for HPV vaccination. The results of this study are expected to inform future research, policies, programs, and community-driven initiatives to enhance acceptability and uptake of HPV vaccination among Indigenous peoples. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42017048844.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePopulation GroupsVaccinationCanadaFemaleHealth Services, IndigenousHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicUterine Cervical NeoplasmsPapillomavirus VaccinesAcceptanceBarriersCancer preventionHesitancyHuman papillomavirus (HPV)Indigenous populationsSupportsUptakeVaccination

Identifiers

PMID29499749
PMCPMC5833130
OpenAlexW2789484758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.