Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29499694›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018

Developing a workbook to support the contextualisation of global health systems guidance: a case study identifying steps and critical factors for success in this process at WHO.

Elizabeth Alvarez, John N Lavis, Melissa Brouwers, Lisa Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth AlvarezDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, CRL 2nd Floor, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. alvare@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2333-0144
John N LavisDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, CRL 2nd Floor, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Melissa BrouwersDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Hospital Site G Wing, 2nd Floor, Room 207, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada.
Lisa SchwartzDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, CRL 2nd Floor, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal guidance can help countries strengthen their health systems to deliver effective interventions to their populations. However, to have an impact, guidance needs to be contextualised or adapted to local settings; this process includes consideration of health system arrangements and political system factors. To date, methods to support contextualisation do not exist. In response, a workbook was designed to provide specific methods and strategies to enable the contextualisation of WHO's 'Optimizing health worker roles to improve maternal and newborn health' (OptimizeMNH) guidance at the national or subnational level. The objective of this study was to describe the process of developing the workbook and identify key steps of the development process, barriers that arose and facilitators that helped overcome some of these barriers.

methodsA qualitative single case study design was carried out. Interviews, documents and a reflexive journal were used. Constant comparison and an edit-style of organisation were used during data analysis to develop concepts, themes, subthemes and relationships among them.

resultsThirteen interviews were conducted and 52 documents were reviewed. Three main steps were identified in the process of developing the workbook for health systems guidance contextualisation, namely (1) determining the need for and gaining approval to develop the workbook, (2) developing the workbook (taking on the task, creating the structure of the workbook, operationalising its components, undergoing approval processes and editing it), and (3) implementing the workbook both at the WHO level and at the national/subnational level. Five barriers and/or facilitators emerged relevant to each step, namely (1) having well-placed and credible champions, (2) creating and capitalising on opportunities, (3) finding the right language to engage various actors and obtain buy-in, (4) obtaining and maintaining meaningful buy-in, and (5) ensuring access to resources.

conclusionsUnderstanding the key steps and the critical factors involved in the process of developing the workbook could help in the planning of similar and other tools aimed to support the implementation of WHO guidance. A plan for dissemination and implementation needs to be addressed during the preparation of these tools.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareGlobal HealthGuidelines as TopicHealth PersonnelMaternal-Child Health ServicesTranslational Research, BiomedicalCapacity BuildingCommunicationHealth ResourcesHumansPoliticsPublishingQualitative ResearchResidence CharacteristicsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health OrganizationCase studyContextualisationGuidanceHealth system strengtheningKnowledge translationPolitical systemQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29499694
PMCPMC5833055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.