Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29499685›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Kangaroo mother care: using formative research to design an acceptable community intervention.

Sarmila Mazumder, Ravi Prakash Upadhyay, Zelee Hill, Sunita Taneja, Brinda Dube, Jasmine Kaur, Medha Shekhar, Runa Ghosh, Shruti Bisht, Jose Carlos Martines and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sarmila MazumderCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Ravi Prakash UpadhyayCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Zelee HillInstitute for Global Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College of London, London, UK.
Sunita TanejaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Brinda DubeCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Jasmine KaurCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Medha ShekharCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Runa GhoshCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Shruti BishtCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Jose Carlos MartinesCentre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health, Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Rajiv BahlDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Halvor SommerfeltCentre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health, Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nita BhandariCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, 45, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi, 110016, India. nita.bhandari@sas.org.in.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow and middle income countries (LMICs), including India, contribute to a major proportion of low birth weight (LBW) infants globally. These infants require special care. Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) in hospitals is a cost effective and efficacious intervention. In institutional deliveries, the duration of facility stay is often short. In LMICs, a substantial proportion of deliveries still occur at home and access to health care services is limited. In these circumstances, a pragmatic choice may be to initiate KMC at home for LBW babies. However, evidence is lacking on benefits of community-initiated KMC (cKMC). Promoting KMC at home without an understanding of its acceptability may lead to limited success.

methodsWe conducted formative research to assess the feasibility, acceptability and adoption of cKMC with the aim of designing an intervention package for a randomised controlled trial in LBW infants in Haryana, India. Qualitative methods included 40 in-depth interviews with recently delivered women and 6 focus group discussions, two each with fathers and grandfathers, grandmothers, and community health workers. A prototype intervention package to promote cKMC was developed and tested in 28 mother-infant pairs (of them, one mother had twins), using Household (HH) trials.

resultsWe found that most mothers in the community recognized that babies born small required special care. In spite of not being aware of the practice of KMC, respondents felt that creating awareness of KMC benefits will promote practice. They expressed concerns about doing KMC for long periods because mothers needed rest after delivery. However, the cultural practice of recently delivered women not expected to be doing household chores and availability of other family members were identified as enablers. HH trials provided an opportunity to test the intervention package and showed high acceptability for KMC. Most mothers perceived benefits such as weight gain and increased activity in the infant.

conclusionsCommunity-initiated KMC is acceptable by mothers and adoption rates are high. Formative research is essential for developing a strategy for delivery of an intervention.

trial registrationTrial registration number CTRI/2015/10/006267 . Name of Registry: Clinical Trials Registry - India. URL of Registry: http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php Date of Registration: 15/10/2015. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 18/04/2015.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesInfant, Low Birth WeightKangaroo-Mother Care MethodFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornMaleMothersPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchFormative researchHousehold trialsKangaroo mother care

Identifiers

PMID29499685
PMCPMC5833044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.