Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29499682›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

What do medical students know about e-cigarettes? A cross-sectional survey from one U.S. medical school.

Katie Hinderaker, David V Power, Sharon Allen, Ellen Parker, Kolawole Okuyemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What Do Dental Students Know About E-Cigarettes? A Cross-Sectional Survey from One Palestinian Dental School.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Otolaryngology Resident Education and Perceptions of e-cigarettes.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katie HinderakerUniversity of Minnesota - St Joseph's Family Medicine Residency Program, 580 Rice Street, St. Paul, MN, 55103, USA. kehoff@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5511-1849
David V PowerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Sharon AllenDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Ellen ParkerSanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.
Kolawole OkuyemiDepartment of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has rapidly increased, there is little data about what United States medical students know or are taught about them. This study examined medical students' experiences, knowledge, and attitudes regarding e-cigarettes, as well as their evaluation of their education on e-cigarettes.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey of medical students currently enrolled at the University of Minnesota Medical School (n = 984) was conducted over a three-week period in August and September 2015. Primary outcomes included students' personal experiences with e-cigarettes, knowledge and attitudes about e-cigarettes, and students' assessment of their education on e-cigarettes.

results66.9% medical students completed the survey. 58% (n = 382) of participants identified as female. 35.8% (n = 235) were "not sure" whether e-cigarettes were approved by the FDA for smoking cessation, while 4.1% (n = 27) falsely believed they were. While 82.9% (n = 543) agreed or strongly agreed that they felt confident in their ability to discuss traditional cigarette use with patients, only 12.4% (n = 81) agreed or strongly agreed that they felt confident in their ability to discuss e-cigarettes with patients. 94.8% (n = 619) of participants believed that they had not received adequate education about e-cigarettes in medical school. A higher proportion of males reported ever using an e-cigarette.

conclusionsThe gaps in medical student knowledge and wide variances in attitudes about e-cigarettes at one medical school together with their report of inadequate education in an environment of increasing use of e-cigarette use in the U.S. speaks to a need for the development of medical school curriculum on e-cigarettes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMinnesotaSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAlternative nicotine productsE-cigarettesElectronic cigaretteMedical school curriculum developmentMedical student education

Identifiers

PMID29499682
PMCPMC5834872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.