Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29499015›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society2018

Electrical Stimulation Mapping of the Brain: Basic Principles and Emerging Alternatives.

Anthony L Ritaccio, Peter Brunner, Gerwin Schalk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03641391 (Prospective Study of Awake Intraoperative Language Mapping and Construction of Chinese Probabilistic Map Based on Direct Electrical Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03641391 naunknown statusnot on this map

Prospective Study of Awake Intraoperative Language Mapping and Construction of Chinese Probabilistic Map Based on Direct Electrical Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuashan HospitalRan2018 to 2023Enrolled300ConditionsGliomaArmsIntraoperative direct cortical electrical stimulation, Intraoperative direct subcortical electrical stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony L RitaccioDepartment of Neurology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, U.S.A.
Peter BrunnerDepartment of Neurology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, U.S.A.
Gerwin SchalkDepartment of Neurology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, U.S.A.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB018783 · NIBIB · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI Theresa M. Vaughan · 2014 to 2026
$15.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB018783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) of the brain for clinical use is approximating a century. Despite this long-standing history, the value of ESM for guiding surgical resections and sparing eloquent cortex is documented largely by small retrospective studies, and ESM protocols are largely inherited and lack standardization. Although models are imperfect and mechanisms are complex, the probabilistic causality of ESM has guaranteed its perpetuation into the 21st century. At present, electrical stimulation of cortical tissue is being revisited for network connectivity. In addition, noninvasive and passive mapping techniques are rapidly evolving to complement and potentially replace ESM in specific clinical situations. Lesional and epilepsy neurosurgery cases now offer different opportunities for multimodal functional assessments.

Indexed as

Brain MappingBrainElectric StimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID29499015
PMCPMC5836484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.