Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29498648›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Citizen Science and Community Engagement in Tick Surveillance-A Canadian Case Study.

Julie Lewis, Corinne R Boudreau, James W Patterson, Jonathan Bradet-Legris, Vett K Lloyd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Human-BitingMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Monitoring Risk: Tick andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. The Potential Role of School Citizen Science Programs in Infectious Disease Surveillance: A Critical Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie LewisDepartment. Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB E4L 1G7, Canada. jlewis@mta.ca.
Corinne R BoudreauDepartment. Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB E4L 1G7, Canada. crboudreau@mta.ca.
James W PattersonDepartment. Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB E4L 1G7, Canada. jpatterson@mta.ca.
Jonathan Bradet-LegrisDepartment. Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB E4L 1G7, Canada. jhbradetlegris@mta.ca.
Vett K LloydDepartment. Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB E4L 1G7, Canada. vlloyd@mta.ca.
Mount Allison University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne disease in North America and Europe, and on-going surveillance is required to monitor the spread of the tick vectors as their populations expand under the influence of climate change. Active surveillance involves teams of researchers collecting ticks from field locations with the potential to be sites of establishing tick populations. This process is labor- and time-intensive, limiting the number of sites monitored and the frequency of monitoring. Citizen science initiatives are ideally suited to address this logistical problem and generate high-density and complex data from sites of community importance. In 2014, the same region was monitored by academic researchers, public health workers, and citizen scientists, allowing a comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of each type of surveillance effort. Four community members persisted with tick collections over several years, collectively recovering several hundred ticks. Although deviations from standard surveillance protocols and the choice of tick surveillance sites makes the incorporation of community-generated data into conventional surveillance analyses more complex, this citizen science data remains useful in providing high-density longitudinal tick surveillance of a small area in which detailed ecological observations can be made. Most importantly, partnership between community members and researchers has proven a powerful tool in educating communities about of the risk of tick-vectored diseases and in encouraging tick bite prevention.

Indexed as

citizen sciencecommunity partnershipcrowdsourcingLyme diseasepublic healthtick surveillance

Identifiers

PMID29498648
PMCPMC5872229
OpenAlexW2791805110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.