Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29498614›Full record

ArticleSocial work in health care2018

Psychosocial standards of care for children with cancer and their families: A national survey of pediatric oncology social workers.

Barbara Jones, Jennifer Currin-Mcculloch, Wendy Pelletier, Vicki Sardi-Brown, Peter Brown, Lori Wiener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social work in health care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Early trajectory of psychosocial risk in families of children and adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Distress screening and management for adolescents and young adults: 2022 NCI community oncology program landscape assessment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. From loss to meaning: therapeutic group processes in parental grief after pediatric cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Expert Consensus on the Clinical Practice of Child Life Services].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Health practitioners' perceptions of psychosocial support for siblings of children with poor prognosis cancers: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Financial toxicity among pediatric oncology families during therapy and early survivorship: a qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara Jonesa Steven Hicks School of Social Work , University of Texas at Austin , Austin , USA.
Jennifer Currin-Mccullocha Steven Hicks School of Social Work , University of Texas at Austin , Austin , USA.
Wendy Pelletierb Department of Hematology/Oncology/Blood & Marrow Transplant Program , Alberta Children's Hospital , Calgary , Alberta , Canada.
Vicki Sardi-Brownc Mattie Miracle Cancer Foundation , Washington D.C. , USA.
Peter Brownc Mattie Miracle Cancer Foundation , Washington D.C. , USA.
Lori Wienerd Pediatric Oncology Branch , National Cancer Institute , Bethesda , USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USAlberta Children's Hospital · CANational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2015, an interdisciplinary group of psychosocial experts developed The Standards of Psychosocial Care for Children with Cancer and Their Families. This paper presents data from a national survey of pediatric oncology social workers and their experiences in delivering psychosocial care to children and families. In total, 107 social workers from 81 cancer institutions participated in a 25-item online survey that mirrored the 15 Standards for Psychosocial Care. Both closed and open-ended questions were included. Social work participants reported that psychosocial support is being provided at most cancer centers surveyed, primarily by social workers and child life specialists, addressing adaptation to the cancer diagnosis, treatment, and transitions into survivorship or end-of-life care and bereavement. While social workers reported offering comprehensive services throughout the cancer trajectory, many of the 2015 Standards are not being systematically implemented. Areas for improvement include funding for psychosocial support staff and programs, incorporation of standardized assessment measures, assessment for financial burden throughout treatment and beyond, consistent access to psychology and psychiatry, integrated care for parents and siblings, and more inclusion of palliative care services from time of diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsSocial WorkSocial WorkersSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal CarePediatric oncologypsychosocial caresocial work

Identifiers

PMID29498614
PMCPMC6726426
OpenAlexW2789401075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.