Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29498576›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2019

3D printing and intraoperative neuronavigation tailoring for skull base reconstruction after extended endoscopic endonasal surgery: proof of concept.

Walid I Essayed, Prashin Unadkat, Ahmed Hosny, Sarah Frisken, Marcio S Rassi, Srinivasan Mukundan, James C Weaver, Ossama Al-Mefty, Alexandra J Golby, Ian F Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Walid I EssayedDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Prashin Unadkat2Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
Ahmed Hosny3Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston; and.
Sarah Frisken2Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
Marcio S RassiDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Srinivasan Mukundan2Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
James C Weaver4Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ossama Al-MeftyDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Alexandra J GolbyDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Ian F DunnDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PUJOL, SONIA · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
Multidisciplinary Training in Image-Guided TherapyR25CA089017 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FENNESSY, FIONA · 2001 to 2017
$7.8M
Multimodal Registration of the Brain's Cortical SurfaceR01NS049251 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GOLBY, ALEXANDRA J, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2005 to 2018
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA089017NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS049251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndoscopic endonasal approaches are increasingly performed for the surgical treatment of multiple skull base pathologies. Preventing postoperative CSF leaks remains a major challenge, particularly in extended approaches. In this study, the authors assessed the potential use of modern multimaterial 3D printing and neuronavigation to help model these extended defects and develop specifically tailored prostheses for reconstructive purposes.

methodsExtended endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches were performed on 3 human cadaveric heads. Pre-Preprocedure and intraprocedure CT scans were completed and were used to segment and design extended and tailored skull base models. Multimaterial models with different core/edge interfaces were 3D printed for implantation trials. A novel application of the intraoperative landmark acquisition method was used to transfer the navigation, helping to tailor the extended models.

resultsProstheses were created based on preoperative and intraoperative CT scans. The navigation transfer offered sufficiently accurate data to tailor the preprinted extended skull base defect prostheses. Successful implantation of the skull base prostheses was achieved in all specimens. The progressive flexibility gradient of the models’ edges offered the best compromise for easy intranasal maneuverability, anchoring, and structural stability. Prostheses printed based on intraprocedure CT scans were accurate in shape but slightly undersized.

conclusionsPreoperative 3D printing of patient-specific skull base models is achievable for extended endoscopic endonasal surgery. The careful spatial modeling and the use of a flexibility gradient in the design helped achieve the most stable reconstruction. Neuronavigation can help tailor preprinted prostheses.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalCadaverCerebrospinal Fluid LeakHumansModels, AnatomicNeuronavigationPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsProof of Concept StudyProstheses and ImplantsSkull BaseTomography, X-Ray Computed3Dendoscopicextended endonasal surgeryneuronavigationprintingprostheses and implantsreconstructive surgical proceduresskull base reconstructionsurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID29498576
PMCPMC6119650
OpenAlexW2792988223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.