Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29498539›Full record

ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2018

Effect of Postmortem Interval and Years in Storage on RNA Quality of Tissue at a Repository of the NIH NeuroBioBank.

Kimberly White, Peixin Yang, Ling Li, Amna Farshori, Alexandre E Medina, Horst Ronald Zielke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Polysome Profiling Method for Low-Input Human Postmortem Brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An analysis of RNA quality metrics in human brain tissue.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Epigenetic analyses in forensic medicine: future and challenges.International journal of legal medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Brain banking in the United States and Europe: Importance, challenges, and future trends.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly White1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Peixin Yang2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Ling Li1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Amna Farshori4 Degree Program in Osteopathic Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine , Blacksburg, Virginia.
Alexandre E Medina1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Horst Ronald Zielke1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tissue from 1068 donors was analyzed for RNA quality as a function of postmortem interval (PMI) and years in storage. Approximately 83% of the cortical and cerebellar samples had an RNA integrity number (RIN) of 6 or greater, indicating their likely suitability for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction research. The average RIN value was independent of the PMI, up to at least 36 hours. The RNA quality for specific donated brains could not be predicted based on the PMI. Individual samples with a low PMI could have a poor RIN value, while a sample with a PMI over 36 hours may have a high RIN value. The RIN values for control brain donors, all of whom died suddenly and unexpectedly, were marginally higher than for individuals with clinical brain disorders. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of samples confirmed that RIN values were more critical than PMI for determining suitability of tissue for molecular biological studies and samples should be matched by their RIN values rather than PMI. Importantly, PCR analysis established that tissue stored up to 23 years at -80°C yielded high-quality RNA. These results confirm that postmortem human brain tissue collected by brain and tissue banks over decades can serve as high quality material for the study of human disorders.

Indexed as

BrainBrain DiseasesTissue BanksBrain ChemistryHumansPostmortem ChangesRNATime FactorsRNAbrain bankhuman brainlong-term storagePMIRNA quality

Identifiers

PMID29498539
PMCPMC5906728
OpenAlexW2793039731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.