ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
Patient perspectives on repeated MRI and PET/CT examinations during neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer UsingInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020Trial
- Beyond image quality: Patient experience with long-axial field-of-view and standard PET/CT systems.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Intelligent imaging triage systems for reducing waiting anxiety: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Scanxiety among Adults with Cancer: A Scoping Review to Guide Research and Interventions.Cancers · 2023Article
- Prediction of the effects of radiation therapy in esophageal cancer using diffusion and perfusion MRI.Cancer science · 2021Article
- Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Geometrical Comparison and Quantitative Evaluation ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Optimal timing for prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with esophageal cancer.European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe perceived burden of diagnostic tests by patients during the assessment of esophageal cancer warrants attention with the current increase in repeated imaging for purposes of disease monitoring during and after treatment. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the experienced burden associated with repeated MRI and positron emission tomography with integrated CT (PET/CT) examinations during neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer from the perspective of the patient.
methodsIn 27 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer MRI and PET/CT examinations were performed before nCRT, during nCRT and before surgery. The experienced burden during repeated MRI and PET/CT examinations was evaluated with a self-report questionnaire addressing discomfort, pain, anxiety and embarrassment, each measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = none; up to 5 = very much). In addition, a comparative assessment was used to rank MRI, PET/CT and baseline endoscopy.
resultsAll scans were performed without the occurrence of an adverse event. Few patients experienced discomfort (mean score ±SD: 1.9 ± 1.0 for MRI vs 2.0 ± 1.0 for PET/CT, p = 0.586), pain (1.1 ± 0.4 for MRI vs 1.3 ± 0.7 for PET/CT, p = 0.059), anxiety (1.0 ± 0.2 for MRI vs 1.0 ± 0.2 for PET/CT, p = 1.000) and embarrassment (1.0 ± 0 for MRI vs 1.0 ± 0.2 for PET/CT, p = 0.317) during both MRI and PET/CT. Patients preferred MRI over PET/CT (67% vs 22%, respectively, p = 0.023), and MRI over endoscopy (59% vs 19%, respectively, p = 0.027). In the comparison between PET/CT and endoscopy, 59% of patients preferred PET/CT and 26% preferred endoscopy (p = 0.093).
conclusionRepeated imaging with both MRI and PET/CT is generally well-tolerated for the assessment of response to treatment in esophageal cancer patients. Shorter acquisition times and altered body positioning during scanning will likely improve patient experience. Advances in knowledge: This paper demonstrates that MRI and PET/CT are generally well-tolerated imaging procedures for the assessment of response to treatment in esophageal cancer patients. When asked to rank different tests, patients preferred MRI over PET/CT and endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.