Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29498032›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2019

Genomic Variation and Pharmacokinetics in Old Age: A Quantitative Review of Age- vs. Genotype-Related Differences.

Christof M Dücker, Jürgen Brockmöller

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic Impact ofJournal of the American Heart Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Polypharmacy and precision medicine.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genophenotypic Factors and Pharmacogenomics in Adverse Drug Reactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christof M DückerInstitute for Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Jürgen BrockmöllerInstitute for Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older persons may particularly benefit from pharmacogenetic diagnostics, but there is little clinical evidence on that question. We quantitatively analyzed the effects of age and genotype in drugs with consensus on a therapeutically relevant impact of a genotype. Assuming additive effects of age and genotype, drugs may be classified in groups with different priorities to consider either age, or genotype, or both, in therapy. Particularly interesting were those studies specifically analyzing the age-by-genotype interaction.

Indexed as

GenotypeAgedAged, 80 and overAgingDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsGenetic VariationGenomicsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID29498032
PMCPMC6585622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.