ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2018
Comparison of [
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiopharmaceuticals for PET and SPECT Imaging: A Literature Review over the Last Decade.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Innovative Peptide Therapeutics in the Pipeline: Transforming Cancer Detection and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Advances in Radionuclides and Radiolabelled Peptides for Cancer Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Review
- Advances in Clinical Oncology Research onFrontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Nuclear Imaging of Receptor Expression to Guide Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2019Review
- The Relationship of Metabolic Activity and αvβ3 Receptor Expression in Aggressive Breast Cancer Subtypes Tumors: A Preliminary Report.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the value of PROCEDURES: Forty-two women with suspected breast cancer underwent both [
resultsForty-five breast lesions were found (malignant, n = 38; benign, n = 7). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [
conclusionsThe prospective study demonstrated that [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.