Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497925›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2019

Recovery Within Injury Compensation Schemes: A System Mapping Study.

Alex Collie, Sharon Newnam, Helen Keleher, Alan Petersen, Agnieszka Kosny, Adam P Vogel, Jason Thompson

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ECHO OEM virtual community of learning for primary care.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Experiences, impacts and service needs of injured and ill workers in the WSIB process: evidence from Thunder Bay and District (Ontario, Canada).Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alex CollieInsurance Work and Health Group, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. alex.collie@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-9339
Sharon NewnamAccident Research Centre, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Helen KeleherSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Alan PetersenSchool of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Agnieszka KosnyInstitute of Work and Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada.
Adam P VogelFaculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 550 Swanston Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Jason ThompsonMelbourne School of Design, Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Masson Road, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council LP11020019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Many industrialised nations have systems of injury compensation and rehabilitation that are designed to support injury recovery and return to work. Despite their intention, there is now substantial evidence that injured people, employers and healthcare providers can experience those systems as difficult to navigate, and that this can affect injury recovery. This study sought to characterise the relationships and interactions occurring between actors in three Australian injury compensation systems, to identify the range of factors that impact on injury recovery, and the interactions and inter-relationships between these factors. Methods This study uses data collected directly from injured workers and their family members via qualitative interviews, analysed for major themes and interactions between themes, and then mapped to a system level model. Results Multiple factors across multiple system levels were reported by participants as influencing injury recovery. Factors at the level of the injured person's immediate environment, the organisations and personnel involved in rehabilitation and compensation processes were more commonly cited than governmental or societal factors as influencing physical function, psychological function and work participation. Conclusions The study demonstrates that injury recovery is a complex process influenced by the decisions and actions of organisations and individuals operating across multiple levels of the compensation system. Changes occurring 'upstream', for instance at the level of governmental or organisational policy, can impact injury recovery through both direct and diffuse pathways.

Indexed as

Return to WorkAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleOccupational InjuriesQualitative ResearchWorkers' CompensationCompensationInjuryRecoverySystem

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.