ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2018
Understanding Adult Participant and Parent Empowerment Prior to Evaluation in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02450851 (Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Undiagnosed Disorders Through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A preliminary adaptation and validation of the genetic counseling outcome scale (GCOS-24) for use in Greece.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential usefulness of the GCOS-16 for expanded applications.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Participation in a national diagnostic research study: assessing the patient experience.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Using Rasch measurement theory to explore the fitness for purpose of the genetic counseling outcome scale: a tale of two scales.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Receiving Genomic Sequencing Results through the Victorian Undiagnosed Disease Program: Exploring Parental Experiences.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Genetic counselor roles in the undiagnosed diseases network research study: Clinical care, collaboration, and curation.Journal of genetic counseling · 2022Article
- Family genetic result communication in rare and undiagnosed disease communities: Understanding the practice.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- The genome empowerment scale: An assessment of parental empowerment in families with undiagnosed disease.Clinical genetics · 2019Article
- Cases from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network: The continued value of counseling skills in a new genomic era.Journal of genetic counseling · 2019Article
- The prevalence and impact of psychiatric symptoms in an undiagnosed diseases clinical program.PloS one · 2019Article
- Lysosomal storage diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The burden of living with an undiagnosed condition is high and includes physical and emotional suffering, frustrations, and uncertainty. For patients and families experiencing these stressors, higher levels of empowerment may be associated with better outcomes. Thus, it is important to understand the experiences of patients with undiagnosed conditions and their families affected by undiagnosed conditions in order to identify strategies for fostering empowerment. In this study, we used the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) to assess levels of empowerment and support group participation in 35 adult participants and 67 parents of child participants in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) prior to their UDN in-person evaluation. Our results revealed significantly lower empowerment scores on the GCOS-24 in adult participants compared to parents of child participants [t(100) = - 3.01, p = 0.003, average difference = - 11.12, 95% CI (- 3.78, - 18.46)] and no significant association between support group participation and empowerment scores. The majority of participants (84.3%, 86/102) are not currently participating in any support groups, and participation rates were not significantly different for adult participants and parents of child participants (11.4 vs. 19.7%, respectively, FE p = 0.40). Open-ended responses provided additional insight into support group participation, the challenges of living with undiagnosed conditions, and positive coping strategies. Future research will evaluate the extent to which empowerment scores change as participation in the UDN unfolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.