Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497809›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2018

Maintenance of genome stability: the unifying role of interconnections between the DNA damage response and RNA-processing pathways.

B Mikolaskova, M Jurcik, I Cipakova, M Kretova, M Chovanec, L Cipak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Assessing DNA Damage Through the Cell Cycle Using Flow Cytometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A genetically encoded photoproximity labeling approach for mapping protein territories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. DNA damage and repair: underlying mechanisms leading to microcephaly.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B MikolaskovaDepartment of Genetics, Biomedical Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05, Bratislava, Slovakia.
M JurcikDepartment of Genetics, Biomedical Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05, Bratislava, Slovakia.
I CipakovaDepartment of Genetics, Biomedical Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05, Bratislava, Slovakia.
M KretovaDepartment of Genetics, Biomedical Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05, Bratislava, Slovakia.
M ChovanecDepartment of Genetics, Biomedical Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05, Bratislava, Slovakia.
L CipakDepartment of Genetics, Biomedical Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 05, Bratislava, Slovakia. lubos.cipak@savba.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-6001
Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKInstitute of Chemistry of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

APVV APVV-0111-12APVV APVV-14-0783APVV APVV-16-120People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) European Union's Seventh Framework Programme REA Grant agreement no. 609427, SASPRO Project no. 0032/01/02VEGA 2/0014/14VEGA 2/0026/18VEGA 2/0056/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endogenous and exogenous factors can severely affect the integrity of genetic information by inducing DNA damage and impairing genome stability. The protection of genome integrity is ensured by the so-called "DNA damage response" (DDR), a set of evolutionary-conserved events that, triggered upon DNA damage detection, arrests the cell cycle, and attempts DNA repair. Here, we review the role of the DDR proteins as post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression, in addition to their roles in DNA damage recognition, signaling, and repair. At the same time, we discuss recent insights into how pre-mRNA splicing factors go beyond their splicing activities and play direct functions in detecting, signaling, and repairing DNA damage. The importance of extensive two-way crosstalk and interaction between the RNA processing and the DDR stems from growing evidence that the defects of their communication lead to genomic instability.

Indexed as

DNA DamageGenomic InstabilityRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalDNA RepairProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA PrecursorsRNA Splicing FactorsSignal TransductionProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA PrecursorsRNA Splicing FactorsDNA damage responseDNA repairGenome stabilityR-loopsRNA processing

Identifiers

PMID29497809
OpenAlexW2790309903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.