Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497792›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018

Protective effects of systemic dermatan sulfate treatment in a preclinical model of radiation-induced oral mucositis.

Sylvia Gruber, Katharina Frings, Peter Kuess, Wolfgang Dörr

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Galactosaminoglycans: Medical Applications and Drawbacks.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvia GruberChristian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. sylvia.gruber@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-1676
Katharina FringsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Applied and Translational Radiobiology (ATRAB), Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Peter KuessChristian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang DörrChristian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATChristian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity · ATUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOral mucositis is a frequent, dose-limiting side effect of radio(chemo)therapy of head-and-neck malignancies. The epithelial radiation response is based on multiple tissue changes, which could offer targets for a biologically tailored treatment. The potential of dermatan sulfate (DS) to modulate radiation-induced oral mucositis was tested in an established preclinical mucositis model.

methodsIrradiation was either applied alone or in combination with daily DS treatment (4 mg/kg, subcutaneously) over varying time intervals. Irradiation comprised single dose irradiation with graded doses to the lower tongue surface or daily fractionated irradiation of the whole tongue. Fractionation protocols (5 × 3 Gy/week) over one (days 0-4) or two weeks (days 0-4, 7-11) were terminated by an additional local single dose irradiation to a defined treatment field on the lower tongue surface to induce the mucosal radiation response. The additional single dose irradiation (top-up) on day 7 (after one week of fractionation) or day 14 (after 2 weeks of fractionation) comprised graded doses in order to generate full dose-effect curves. Ulceration of the epithelium of the lower tongue, corresponding to confluent mucositis, was analysed as clinically relevant endpoint. Additionally, the time course parameters, latent time and ulcer duration were analysed.

resultsDS treatment significantly reduced the incidence of ulcerations. DS application over longer time intervals resulted in a more pronounced reduction of ulcer frequency, increased latent times and reduced ulcer duration.

conclusionDS has a significant mucositis-ameliorating activity with pronounced effects on mucositis frequency as well as on time course parameters.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsDermatan SulfateDose Fractionation, RadiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiceMice, Inbred C3HOtorhinolaryngologic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesStomatitisTongueDermatan SulfateDermatan sulfateMouse modelOral mucositisRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29497792
PMCPMC6008363
OpenAlexW2792974948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.