Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497782›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2018

Do daily fluctuations in inhibitory control predict alcohol consumption? An ecological momentary assessment study.

Andrew Jones, Brian Tiplady, Katrijn Houben, Chantal Nederkoorn, Matt Field

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Daily self-control demands and loss of control over drinking: The moderating role of trait impulsivity and peer exposure.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  8. Alcohol and cannabis use predicted by affect-urgency interactions in everyday life.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew JonesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK. ajj@liv.ac.uk.
Brian TipladyAnaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Katrijn HoubenFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Chantal NederkoornFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Matt FieldDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
Maastricht University · NLCambridge Cognition (United Kingdom) · GBUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K001558Medical Research Council MR/K001558/1Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDeficient inhibitory control is predictive of increased alcohol consumption in the laboratory; however, little is known about this relationship in naturalistic, real-world settings.

objectivesIn the present study, we implemented ecological momentary assessment methods to investigate the relationship between inhibitory control and alcohol consumption in the real world.

methodsHeavy drinkers who were motivated to reduce their alcohol consumption (N = 100) were loaned a smartphone which administered a stop signal task twice per day at random intervals between 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. for 2 weeks. Each day, participants also recorded their planned and actual alcohol consumption and their subjective craving and mood. We hypothesised that day-to-day fluctuations in inhibitory control (stop signal reaction time) would predict alcohol consumption, over and above planned consumption and craving.

resultsMultilevel modelling demonstrated that daily alcohol consumption was predicted by planned consumption (β = .816; 95% CI .762-.870) and craving (β = .022; 95% CI .013-.031), but inhibitory control did not predict any additional variance in alcohol consumption. However, secondary analyses demonstrated that the magnitude of deterioration in inhibitory control across the day was a significant predictor of increased alcohol consumption on that day (β = .007; 95% CI .004-.011), after controlling for planned consumption and craving.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that short-term fluctuations in inhibitory control predict alcohol consumption, which suggests that transient fluctuations in inhibition may be a risk factor for heavy drinking episodes.

Indexed as

CravingEcological Momentary AssessmentInhibition, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationFemaleHumansMaleMotivationPredictive Value of TestsSmartphoneTime FactorsAlcoholCravingEcological momentary assessmentInhibitory controlStop signal task

Identifiers

PMID29497782
PMCPMC5919991
OpenAlexW2789897584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.