Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497781›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2018

From gene networks to drugs: systems pharmacology approaches for AUD.

Laura B Ferguson, R Adron Harris, Roy Dayne Mayfield

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. RNA biomarkers for alcohol use disorder.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  3. Topological network measures for drug repositioning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effects of NOP-Related Ligands in Nonhuman Primates.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura B FergusonWaggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A4800, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
R Adron HarrisWaggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A4800, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Roy Dayne MayfieldWaggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A4800, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. dayne.mayfield@austin.utexas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

GENE EXPRESSION IN THE HUMAN ALCOHOLIC BRAINR01AA012404 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI MAYFIELD, ROY DAYNE · 2000 to 2025
$10.7M
Neurochemical & Behavioral Correlates of ETOH EffectsT32AA007471 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Kimberly Nixon · 1987 to 2026
$9.2M
Next Generation Sequencing of Human Alcoholic BrainU01AA020926 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Roy DAYNE MAYFIELD · 2011 to 2026
$6.7M
Molecular mechanisms underlying reduction of alcohol consumption by PPAR agonistsF31AA024332 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI FERGUSON, LAURA BROCKWAY · 2015 to 2017
$67k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA012404NIAAA NIH HHS AA020926NIAAA NIH HHS AA024332NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA024332NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012404NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007471NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA020926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The alcohol research field has amassed an impressive number of gene expression datasets spanning key brain areas for addiction, species (humans as well as multiple animal models), and stages in the addiction cycle (binge/intoxication, withdrawal/negative effect, and preoccupation/anticipation). These data have improved our understanding of the molecular adaptations that eventually lead to dysregulation of brain function and the chronic, relapsing disorder of addiction. Identification of new medications to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD) will likely benefit from the integration of genetic, genomic, and behavioral information included in these important datasets. Systems pharmacology considers drug effects as the outcome of the complex network of interactions a drug has rather than a single drug-molecule interaction. Computational strategies based on this principle that integrate gene expression signatures of pharmaceuticals and disease states have shown promise for identifying treatments that ameliorate disease symptoms (called in silico gene mapping or connectivity mapping). In this review, we suggest that gene expression profiling for in silico mapping is critical to improve drug repurposing and discovery for AUD and other psychiatric illnesses. We highlight studies that successfully apply gene mapping computational approaches to identify or repurpose pharmaceutical treatments for psychiatric illnesses. Furthermore, we address important challenges that must be overcome to maximize the potential of these strategies to translate to the clinic and improve healthcare outcomes.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAnimalsChromosome MappingDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMicroarray AnalysisNarcotic AntagonistsSystems AnalysisTranscriptomeNarcotic AntagonistsAlcohol dependenceAlcoholismConnectivity mapGene expressionIn silico gene mappingL1000LINCSNetwork medicineSystems pharmacologyTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29497781
PMCPMC6298603
OpenAlexW2791331713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.