Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497587›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

A striking new genus and species of cave-dwelling frog (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae: Asterophryinae) from Thailand.

Chatmongkon Suwannapoom, Montri Sumontha, Jitthep Tunprasert, Thiti Ruangsuwan, Parinya Pawangkhanant, Dmitriy V Korost, Nikolay A Poyarkov

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A new species of the genusZoological research · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A new species ofPeerJ · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chatmongkon SuwannapoomDivision of Fishery, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Montri Sumontha *Department of Fishery, Ranong Marine Fisheries Station, Ranong, Thailand.
Jitthep TunprasertDepartment of Ecology, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University, Nakhon Pathom Mueng, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Thiti RuangsuwanDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Parinya PawangkhanantDivision of Fishery, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Dmitriy V KorostGeological Faculty, Petroleum Geology Department, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Nikolay A Poyarkov *Biological Faculty, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7576-2283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on a discovery of

Indexed as

BiogeographyKanchanaburi ProvincemicroCT-scanningmtDNASiamophryne troglodytesGen. et sp. nov.SundalandTadpoleTenasserimTroglophilous life style

Identifiers

PMID29497587
PMCPMC5828679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.