Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497380›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Triple-Gene Therapy for Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept

Mikhail E Sokolov, Farid V Bashirov, Vage A Markosyan, Tatyana V Povysheva, Filip O Fadeev, Andrey A Izmailov, Maxim S Kuztetsov, Zufar Z Safiullov, Maxim M Shmarov, Boris S Naroditskyi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gene-modified leucoconcentrate for personalizedNeural regeneration research · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic Aspects of Inflammation and Immune Response in Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikhail E SokolovDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Farid V BashirovDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Vage A MarkosyanDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Tatyana V PovyshevaDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Filip O FadeevDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Andrey A IzmailovDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Maxim S KuztetsovDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Zufar Z SafiullovDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Maxim M ShmarovGamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, Russia.
Boris S NaroditskyiGamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, Russia.
András PalotásInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Rustem R IslamovDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia.
Kazan State Medical University · RUGamalei Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology · RUAsklepios · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural brain repair after stroke is extremely limited, and current therapeutic options are even more scarce with no clinical break-through in sight. Despite restricted regeneration in the central nervous system, we have previously proved that human umbilical cord blood mono-nuclear cells (UCB-MC) transduced with adenoviral vectors carrying genes encoding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) successfully rescued neurons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and spinal cord injury. This proof-of-principle project was aimed at evaluating the beneficial effects of the same triple-gene approach in stroke. Rats subjected to distal occlusion of the middle cerebral artery were treated intrathecally with a combination of these genes either directly or using our cell-based (UCB-MC) approach. Various techniques and markers were employed to evaluate brain injury and subsequent recovery after treatment. Brain repair was most prominent when therapeutic genes were delivered via adenoviral vector- or UCB-MC-mediated approach. Remodeling of brain cortex in the stroke area was confirmed by reduction of infarct volume and attenuated neural cell death, depletion of astrocytes and microglial cells, and increase in the number of oligodendroglial cells and synaptic proteins expression. These results imply that intrathecal injection of genetically engineered UCB-MC over-expressing therapeutic molecules (VEGF, GDNF, and NCAM) following cerebral blood vessel occlusion might represent a novel avenue for future research into treating stroke.

Indexed as

adenoviral vectorGDNFgene therapyhuman umbilical cord blood mono-nuclear cellmiddle cerebral arteryNCAMstrokeVEGF

Identifiers

PMID29497380
PMCPMC5818439
OpenAlexW2790979192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.