ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2018
Circulating tumor DNA measurement provides reliable mutation detection in mice with human lung cancer xenografts.
Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA remnants in red blood cells enable early detection of cancer.Cell research · 2025Article
- Establishment of xenografts and methods to evaluate tumor burden for the three most frequent subclasses of pediatric-type diffuse high grade gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosis of Sepsis and Acute Kidney Injury.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: evaluating utility and challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Basic Science with Preclinical Models to Investigate and Develop Liquid Biopsy: What Are the Available Data and Is It a Fruitful Approach?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Release mechanisms of major DAMPs.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2021Review
- Saliva-derived cfDNA is applicable for EGFR mutation detection but not for quantitation analysis in non-small cell lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genotype-directed targeted therapy has become one of the standard treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There have been numerous limitations associated with mutation analysis of tissue samples. Consequently, mutational profile analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by highly sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay has been developed. Possibly due to differences in cfDNA concentrations, previous studies have shown numerous discrepancies in mutation detection consistency between tissue and cfDNA. In order to rigorously analyze the amount of cfDNA needed, we constructed 72 athymic nude mice xenografted with NCI-H1975 (harboring a EGFR T790M mutation) or NCI-H460 (harboring a KRAS Q61H mutation) human NSCLC. We thoroughly investigated the relationship between plasma cfDNA using Q-PCR targeting human long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon and the mouse ACTB gene, and the accuracy of mutation detection by ddPCR at different times post-graft. Our results show that the concentration and fragmentation of human (tumor) derived cfDNA (hctDNA) were positively correlated with tumor weight, but not with mouse-derived cfDNA (mcfDNA). Quantification of cfDNA by Q-PCR depends on the amplified target length. Mutation copies in plasma of per milliliter were positively linked to tumor weight, hctDNA level and hctDNA/mcfDNA ratio, respectively. Furthermore, tumor weight, hctDNA level and ratio of hctDNA/mcfDNA were significantly higher in cfDNA mutation-positive mice than in negative mice. Also, our data indicate that when plasma hctDNA level and hctDNA/mcfDNA ratio reach a certain level in xenografted mice, plasma cfDNA mutation can be detected. In summary, the present study suggests that determination of ctDNA levels may be essential for reliable mutation detection by analysis of cfDNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.