Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497131›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

PDE4D regulates Spine Plasticity and Memory in the Retrosplenial Cortex.

Karsten Baumgärtel, Andrea Green, Diana Hornberger, Jennifer Lapira, Christopher Rex, Damian G Wheeler, Marco Peters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Longevity, enhanced memory, and altered density of dendritic spines in hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus after hemizygous deletion of Pde2a in mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Protection from AmyloidThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karsten BaumgärtelDart Neuroscience, LLC, 12278, Scripps Summit Drive, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA.
Andrea GreenDart Neuroscience, LLC, 12278, Scripps Summit Drive, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA.
Diana HornbergerDart Neuroscience, LLC, 12278, Scripps Summit Drive, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA.
Jennifer LapiraDart Neuroscience, LLC, 12278, Scripps Summit Drive, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA.
Christopher RexAfraxis Inc., 6605, Nancy Ridge Rd. Suite 224, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
Damian G WheelerDart Neuroscience, LLC, 12278, Scripps Summit Drive, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA.
Marco PetersDart Neuroscience, LLC, 12278, Scripps Summit Drive, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA. dr.marco.peters@gmail.com.
Dart NeuroScience (United States) · USScripps (United States) · USAfraxis (United States) · US

Funding

U of Calif, San Diego Neuroscience Microscopy ImagingP30NS047101 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GLEESON, JOSEPH G, ZHENG, BINHAI · 2003 to 2022
$9.0M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS047101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retrosplenial cortex (RSC) plays a critical role in episodic memory, but the molecular mechanisms governing plasticity in this structure are poorly understood. Diverse studies have demonstrated a role for RSC in acquisition, early consolidation and retrieval similar to the hippocampus (HC), as well as in systems consolidation similar to the anterior cingulate cortex. Here, we asked whether established molecular and structural substrates of memory consolidation in the HC also engage in RSC shortly after learning. We show striking parallels in training induced gene-activation in HC and RSC following contextual conditioning, which is blocked by systemic administration of an NMDA receptor antagonist. Long-term memory is enhanced by retrosplenial and hippocampal knockdown (KD) of the cAMP specific phosphodiesterase Pde4d. However, while training per se induces lasting spine changes in HC, this does not occur in RSC. Instead, increases in the number of mature dendritic spines are found in the RSC only if cAMP signaling is augmented by Pde4d KD, and spine changes are at least partially independent of training. This research highlights parallels and differences in spine plasticity mechanisms between HC and RSC, and provides evidence for a functional dissociation of the two.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4FearGyrus CinguliHippocampusMaleMemoryMemory ConsolidationMemory, Long-TermMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronal PlasticityReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4PDE4D protein, mouseReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID29497131
PMCPMC5832851
OpenAlexW2807318456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.