Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29497097›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Boat noise impacts risk assessment in a coral reef fish but effects depend on engine type.

Mark I McCormick, Bridie J M Allan, Harry Harding, Stephen D Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptomic and Behavioral Studies of Small Yellow Croaker (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Boat noise alters individual behaviors but not communication between partners in a fish-shrimp mutualism.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  11. Separate and combined effects of boat noise and a live crab predator on mussel valve gape behavior.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark I McCormickARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, and College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia. mark.mccormick@jcu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9289-1645
Bridie J M AllanARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, and College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia.
Harry HardingSchool of Biological Sciences & Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.
Stephen D SimpsonBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Geoffrey Pope, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4856-6164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human noise pollution has increased markedly since the start of industrialization and there is international concern about how this may impact wildlife. Here we determined whether real motorboat noise affected the behavior, space use and escape response of a juvenile damselfish (Pomacentrus wardi) in the wild, and explored whether fish respond effectively to chemical and visual threats in the presence of two common types of motorboat noise. Noise from 30 hp 2-stroke outboard motors reduced boldness and activity of fish on habitat patches compared to ambient reef-sound controls. Fish also no longer responded to alarm odours with an antipredator response, instead increasing activity and space use, and fewer fish responded appropriately to a looming threat. In contrast, while there was a minor influence of noise from a 30 hp 4-stroke outboard on space use, there was no influence on their ability to respond to alarm odours, and no impact on their escape response. Evidence suggests that anthropogenic noise impacts the way juvenile fish assess risk, which will reduce individual fitness and survival, however, not all engine types cause major effects. This finding may give managers options by which they can reduce the impact of motorboat noise on inshore fish communities.

Indexed as

AnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesCoral ReefsEcosystemFishesHumansNoisePerciformesRisk AssessmentShips

Identifiers

PMID29497097
PMCPMC5832755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.