ArticleJournal of medical genetics2018
Practice guideline: joint CCMG-SOGC recommendations for the use of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis and assessment of fetal loss in Canada.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.
- What's out there for parents? A systematic review of online information about prenatal microarray and exome sequencing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2022Pooled it
- How to deal with uncertainty in prenatal genomics: A systematic review of guidelines and policies.Clinical genetics · 2021Pooled it
- A nationwide survey on attitudes of obstetricians and gynecologists toward comprehensive prenatal genetic testing in Japan.Journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Prenatal SNP-array chromosomal microarray analysis in 3,549 pregnancies: indication-specific yields and clinical implications.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Rapid prenatal CNV detection using nanopore technology.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Advancements in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Testing: Emerging Technologies and Evolving Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A retrospective single center analysis of fetuses with region of homozygosity detected by single nucleotide polymorphism array.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical application of single nucleotide polymorphism array in prenatal diagnosis: Experience with 8753 samples.PloS one · 2025Article
- Molecular Genetic and Clinical Characteristics of Fetuses With Chromosome 16 Short-Arm Microdeletions/Microduplications.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- Association of prenatal Cleft Lip and Palate ultrasound abnormalities with copy number variants at a single Chinese tertiary center.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Correlation between maternal serum biomarkers and the risk of fetal chromosome copy number variants: a single-center retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Chromosomal abnormalities detected by chromosomal microarray analysis and pregnancy outcomes of 4211 fetuses with high-risk prenatal indications.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Recurrent neural network for predicting absence of heterozygosity from low pass WGS with ultra-low depth.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Comparison of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnant Women with Fetal Ultrasonic Soft Markers.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Is Nuchal Translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an Indication for cfDNA Testing or Microarray? - A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2024Article
- Associations between genomic aberrations, increased nuchal translucency, and pregnancy outcomes: a comprehensive analysis of 2,272 singleton pregnancies in women under 35.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis.BMJ open · 2023Article
- An uninformative NIPT as an early indicator of cri-du-chat due to a chromosomal 5;18 translocation-An atypical presentation of a rare cytogenetic phenomenon.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Does Increased Resolution Equal Increased Yield?Genes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this guideline is to provide updated recommendations for Canadian genetic counsellors, medical geneticists, maternal fetal medicine specialists, clinical laboratory geneticists and other practitioners regarding the use of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for prenatal diagnosis. This guideline replaces the 2011 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC)-Canadian College of Medical Geneticists (CCMG) Joint Technical Update.
methodsA multidisciplinary group consisting of medical geneticists, genetic counsellors, maternal fetal medicine specialists and clinical laboratory geneticists was assembled to review existing literature and guidelines for use of CMA in prenatal care and to make recommendations relevant to the Canadian context. The statement was circulated for comment to the CCMG membership-at-large for feedback and, following incorporation of feedback, was approved by the CCMG Board of Directors on 5 June 2017 and the SOGC Board of Directors on 19 June 2017. RESULTS AND
conclusionsRecommendations include but are not limited to: (1) CMA should be offered following a normal rapid aneuploidy screen when multiple fetal malformations are detected (II-1A) or for nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.5 mm (II-2B) (recommendation 1); (2) a professional with expertise in prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis should provide genetic counselling to obtain informed consent, discuss the limitations of the methodology, obtain the parental decisions for return of incidental findings (II-2A) (recommendation 4) and provide post-test counselling for reporting of test results (III-A) (recommendation 9); (3) the resolution of chromosomal microarray analysis should be similar to postnatal microarray platforms to ensure small pathogenic variants are detected. To minimise the reporting of uncertain findings, it is recommended that variants of unknown significance (VOUS) smaller than 500 Kb deletion or 1 Mb duplication not be routinely reported in the prenatal context. Additionally, VOUS above these cut-offs should only be reported if there is significant supporting evidence that deletion or duplication of the region may be pathogenic (III-B) (recommendation 5); (4) secondary findings associated with a medically actionable disorder with childhood onset should be reported, whereas variants associated with adult-onset conditions should not be reported unless requested by the parents or disclosure can prevent serious harm to family members (III-A) (recommendation 8).The working group recognises that there is variability across Canada in delivery of prenatal testing, and these recommendations were developed to promote consistency and provide a minimum standard for all provinces and territories across the country (recommendation 9).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.