Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29496963›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2018

Quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human colon cancer DLD-1 cells differing in ploidy and chromosome stability.

Cristina Viganó, Conrad von Schubert, Erik Ahrné, Alexander Schmidt, Thomas Lorber, Lukas Bubendorf, Judith R F De Vetter, Guido J R Zaman, Zuzana Storchova, Erich A Nigg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The two sides of chromosomal instability: drivers and brakes in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Whole-Genome Doubling as a source of cancer: how, when, where, and why?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristina ViganóBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Conrad von SchubertBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Erik AhrnéBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander SchmidtBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas LorberInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Lukas BubendorfInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Judith R F De VetterNetherlands Translational Research Center B.V., 5340 Oss, The Netherlands.
Guido J R ZamanNetherlands Translational Research Center B.V., 5340 Oss, The Netherlands.
Zuzana StorchovaUniversity of Kaiserslautern, 3049 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Erich A NiggBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHCenter for Translational Molecular Medicine · NLUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although aneuploidy is poorly tolerated during embryogenesis, aneuploidy and whole chromosomal instability (CIN) are common hallmarks of cancer, raising the question of how cancer cells can thrive in spite of chromosome aberrations. Here we present a comprehensive and quantitative proteomics analysis of isogenic DLD-1 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells lines, aimed at identifying cellular responses to changes in ploidy and/or CIN. Specifically, we compared diploid (2N) and tetraploid (4N) cells with posttetraploid aneuploid (PTA) clones and engineered trisomic clones. Our study provides a comparative data set on the proteomes and phosphoproteomes of the above cell lines, comprising several thousand proteins and phosphopeptides. In comparison to the parental 2N line, we observed changes in proteins associated with stress responses and with interferon signaling. Although we did not detect a conspicuous protein signature associated with CIN, we observed many changes in phosphopeptides that relate to fundamental cellular processes, including mitotic progression and spindle function. Most importantly, we found that most changes detectable in PTA cells were already present in the 4N progenitor line. This suggests that activation of mitotic pathways through hyper-phosphorylation likely constitutes an important response to chromosomal burden. In line with this conclusion, cells with extensive chromosome gains showed differential sensitivity toward a number of inhibitors targeting cell cycle kinases, suggesting that the efficacy of anti-mitotic drugs may depend on the karyotype of cancer cells.

Indexed as

PloidiesAdenocarcinomaAneuploidyCell Line, TumorChromosomal InstabilityChromosome AberrationsColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDiploidyHumansKaryotypingPhosphorylationProteomeProteomicsTetraploidyProteome

Identifiers

PMID29496963
PMCPMC5921571
OpenAlexW2792989984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.