ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2018
Science of science.
Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 221 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
221 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The global scientific evolution of cardiopulmonary performance and threshold research in sports sciences during 2010-2025: a comparative bibliometric analysis based on web of science and scopus.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the Landscape of Global Anticancer Organometallics Research: A Systematic Review.Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence in type 2 diabetes prediction: a comprehensive 33-year bibliometric and literature analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Limitations of nomogram models in predicting survival outcomes for glioma patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Methods for non-proportional hazards in clinical trials: A systematic review.Statistical methods in medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2023Pooled it
- The characteristics of early-stage research into human genes are substantially different from subsequent research.PLoS biology · 2022Pooled it
- Quantifying the Dynamics of Network Detachment Across Scientific, Technological, Commercial, and Pharmacological Domains.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Propagation and preservation of AI-discovered problem-solving strategies in human culture.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Metastability and Entropy Peaks in Antagonistic Multiplex Consensus Dynamics.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantifying institutional gender inequality in contemporary visual art.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Science Is About Thinking: How Can We Protect Thinking Time in a Distracted Digital World?Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Discovering multiscale deep formulas in complex systems via neural-guided lambda calculus.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Making scientific publishing more balanced and reversing the current dangerous drift to better support global environmental conservation and planetary health.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- A machine learning perspective on three decades of methanol synthesis: research framework and experimental operation insights.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Nonlinear Dynamics of Advancement Toward the ESI Top 1‱: Decomposition and Forecasting Evidence from an Emerging University.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A digital archive reveals how a funding agency cooperated with academics to support the nascent field of genomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Leadership and inequality in latin american neurosurgery, 2000-2024: a bibliometric and geospatial study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- The institutional dynamics of inequality for women inventors who break with conventional thinking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Uncovering simultaneous breakthroughs with a robust measure of disruptiveness.Science advances · 2026Article
161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying fundamental drivers of science and developing predictive models to capture its evolution are instrumental for the design of policies that can improve the scientific enterprise-for example, through enhanced career paths for scientists, better performance evaluation for organizations hosting research, discovery of novel effective funding vehicles, and even identification of promising regions along the scientific frontier. The science of science uses large-scale data on the production of science to search for universal and domain-specific patterns. Here, we review recent developments in this transdisciplinary field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.