Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29496755›Full record

ArticleThe European respiratory journal2018

Observing dyspnoea in others elicits dyspnoea, negative affect and brain responses.

Michaela Herzog, Josef Sucec, Ilse Van Diest, Omer Van den Bergh, Cecile Chenivesse, Paul Davenport, Thomas Similowski, Andreas von Leupoldt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European respiratory journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. 'Medical education online · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Breathlessness and the brain: the role of expectation.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Respiratory Suffering in the ICU: Time for Our Next Great Cause.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michaela HerzogHealth Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Josef SucecHealth Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ilse Van DiestHealth Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Omer Van den BerghHealth Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Cecile ChenivesseService de Pneumologie et Immuno-Allergologie, Université de Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Paul DavenportDept of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Thomas SimilowskiSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France.
Andreas von LeupoldtHealth Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium andreas.vonleupoldt@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-8539-8131
KU Leuven · BEInserm · FRZero to Three · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dyspnoea is usually caused by diagnosable cardiorespiratory mechanisms. However, frequently dyspnoea relates only weakly or not at all to cardiorespiratory functioning, suggesting that additional neuropsychosocial processes contribute to its experience. We tested whether the mere observation of dyspnoea in others constitutes such a process and would elicit dyspnoea, negative affect and increased brain responses in the observer.In three studies, series of pictures and videos were presented, which either depicted persons suffering from dyspnoea or nondyspnoeic control stimuli. Self-reports of dyspnoea and affective state were obtained in all studies. Additionally, respiratory variables and brain responses during picture viewing (late positive potentials in electroencephalograms) were measured in one study.In all studies, dyspnoea-related pictures and videos elicited mild-to-moderate dyspnoea and increased negative affect compared to control stimuli. This was paralleled by increased late positive potentials for dyspnoea-related pictures while respiratory variables did not change. Moreover, increased dyspnoea correlated modestly with higher levels of empathy in observers.The present results demonstrate that observing dyspnoea in others elicits mild-to-moderate dyspnoea, negative affect, and increased brain responses in the absence of respiratory changes. This vicarious dyspnoea has clinical relevance, as it might increase suffering in the family and medical caregivers of dyspnoeic patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAffectBrainDyspneaElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleSelf ReportVirtual RealityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29496755
OpenAlexW2790662316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.