ReviewCancer genomics & proteomics
Insights into Novel Prognostic and Possible Predictive Biomarkers of Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Review in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Xanthohumol as a potential therapeutic strategy for acute myeloid leukemia: Targeting the FLT3/SRPK1 signaling axis.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2025Article
- Integrated network pharmacology and metabolomics to reveal the mechanism of Pinellia ternata inhibiting non-small cell lung cancer cells.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- Mechanism Research of PZD Inhibiting Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation, Invasion, and Migration based on Network Pharmacology.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Article
- Article
- Prognostic nomogram for predicting long-term survival in bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumor patients receiving resection.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- MiRNA Expression in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Frequent Localizations.Non-coding RNA · 2021Review
- Molecular Pathology of Well-Differentiated Pulmonary and Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Do Pathologists Need to Know?Endocrine pathology · 2021Review
- Long Non-coding RNAs in Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Endocrine pathology · 2020Article
- The challenges of evaluating predictive biomarkers using small biopsy tissue samples and liquid biopsies from non-small cell lung cancer patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of typical and atypical carcinoids, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and small-cell lung carcinomas. NETs are highly heterogeneous in histological characteristics, clinical presentation and natural history. While there are morphological and immunohistochemical criteria to establish diagnosis, there is a lack of universal consensus for prognostic factors or therapeutic targets for personalized treatment of the disease. Thus, identifying potential markers of neuroendocrine differentiation and prognostic factors remains of high importance. This review provides an insight into promising molecules and genes that are implicated in NET carcinogenesis, cell-cycle regulation, chromatin remodeling, apoptosis, intracellular cascades and cell-cell interactions. Additionally it supports a basis for classifying these tumors into categories that distinct molecular characteristics and disease natural history, which may have a direct impact on treatment options. In light of the recent approval of everolimus, mammalian target of rapamycin pathway inhibition and related biomarkers may play a central role in the treatment of pulmonary NETs. Future clinical trials that integrate molecular profiling are deemed necessary in order to treat patients with NET on a personalized basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.