Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29496499›Full record

Observational studyChest2018

Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker's Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial.

Gerard A Silvestri, Nichole T Tanner, Paul Kearney, Anil Vachani, Pierre P Massion, Alexander Porter, Steven C Springmeyer, Kenneth C Fang, David Midthun, Peter J Mazzone and 1 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Chest, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01752114 completednot on this map

Early Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules Using A Plasma Proteomic Classifier, Protocol Number 1001-12

TypeobservationalSponsorIntegrated DiagnosticsRan2012 to 2016Enrolled684ConditionsPrecancerous Conditions, Carcinoma
NCT05738031 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Investigating Incidental Pulmonary Nodules in Underserved Communities

TypeobservationalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsLung, Node
NCT07615556 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Circulating Tumor DNA Mutations and Methylation Status as Biomarkers for Early Detection of Lung Cancer in Patients With Suspicious Lung Nodules

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsLung Nodules, Lung Cancer Screening, Suspected Lung CancerArmsctDNA mutations and methylation with SPOTMAS Lung assays, Non-contrast LDCT Thorax scans
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Updates in Lung Cancer Screening: A Decade of Evidence.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gerard A SilvestriThoracic Oncology Research Group Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Electronic address: silvestri@musc.edu.
Nichole T TannerThoracic Oncology Research Group Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Hospital, Charleston, SC.
Paul KearneyIntegrated Diagnostics, Seattle, WA.
Anil VachaniDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Penn Lung Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Pierre P MassionThoracic Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Nashville, and Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN.
Alexander PorterIntegrated Diagnostics, Seattle, WA.
Steven C SpringmeyerIntegrated Diagnostics, Seattle, WA.
Kenneth C FangIntegrated Diagnostics, Seattle, WA.
David MidthunMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Peter J MazzoneRespiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
PANOPTIC Trial Team

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Rebecca A Simmons · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Validation of Biomarkers of Risk for the Early Detection of Lung CancerU01CA152662 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEPPEN, STEPHEN, GROGAN, ERIC L · 2010 to 2025
$12.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152662NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung nodules are a diagnostic challenge, with an estimated yearly incidence of 1.6 million in the United States. This study evaluated the accuracy of an integrated proteomic classifier in identifying benign nodules in patients with a pretest probability of cancer (pCA) ≤ 50%.

methodsA prospective, multicenter observational trial of 685 patients with 8- to 30-mm lung nodules was conducted. Multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry was used to measure the relative abundance of two plasma proteins, LG3BP and C163A. Results were integrated with a clinical risk prediction model to identify likely benign nodules. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were calculated. Estimates of potential changes in invasive testing had the integrated classifier results been available and acted on were made.

resultsA subgroup of 178 patients with a clinician-assessed pCA ≤ 50% had a 16% prevalence of lung cancer. The integrated classifier demonstrated a sensitivity of 97% (CI, 82-100), a specificity of 44% (CI, 36-52), and a negative predictive value of 98% (CI, 92-100) in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. The classifier performed better than PET, validated lung nodule risk models, and physician cancer probability estimates (P < .001). If the integrated classifier results were used to direct care, 40% fewer procedures would be performed on benign nodules, and 3% of malignant nodules would be misclassified.

conclusionsWhen used in patients with lung nodules with a pCA ≤ 50%, the integrated classifier accurately identifies benign lung nodules with good performance characteristics. If used in clinical practice, invasive procedures could be reduced by diverting benign nodules to surveillance. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01752114; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesNeoplasm ProteinsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProteomicsRisk FactorsBiomarkersNeoplasm Proteinsbiomarkerdiagnosislung cancerproteomicspulmonary nodulesrisk models

Identifiers

PMID29496499
PMCPMC6689113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.