Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29496486›Full record

ReviewJournal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao2018

Developing DNA methylation-based diagnostic biomarkers.

Hyerim Kim, Xudong Wang, Peng Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Epigenome-wide association studies of allergic disease and the environment.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The regulation mechanisms and the Lamarckian inheritance property of DNA methylation in animals.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyerim KimDepartment of Human Genetics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Xudong WangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Second Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, China. Electronic address: wangxudong1971@126.com.
Peng JinDepartment of Human Genetics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: peng.jin@emory.edu.
Emory University · USSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

Molecular Basis of rCGG-Mediated NeurodegenerationR01NS051630 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NELSON, DAVID LOREN · 2006 to 2023
$9.8M
Translational models of neurodevelopmental epigenetics and disease using human iPSCsP01NS097206 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SONG, HONGJUN · 2016 to 2020
$4.3M
Tet-mediated Epigenetic Modulation in AutismR01MH102690 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JIN, PENG, WARREN, STEPHEN T. · 2014 to 2017
$2.6M
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in NeurodevelopmentR01NS079625 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JIN, PENG · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102690NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS097206NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051630NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An emerging paradigm shift for disease diagnosis is to rely on molecular characterization beyond traditional clinical and symptom-based examinations. Although genetic alterations and transcription signature were first introduced as potential biomarkers, clinical implementations of these markers are limited due to low reproducibility and accuracy. Instead, epigenetic changes are considered as an alternative approach to disease diagnosis. Complex epigenetic regulation is required for normal biological functions and it has been shown that distinctive epigenetic disruptions could contribute to disease pathogenesis. Disease-specific epigenetic changes, especially DNA methylation, have been observed, suggesting its potential as disease biomarkers for diagnosis. In addition to specificity, the feasibility of detecting disease-associated methylation marks in the biological specimens collected noninvasively, such as blood samples, has driven the clinical studies to validate disease-specific DNA methylation changes as a diagnostic biomarker. Here, we highlight the advantages of DNA methylation signature for diagnosis in different diseases and discuss the statistical and technical challenges to be overcome before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasmsPathology, MolecularBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerBrain disordersCancerDNA methylationEpigeneticsLiquid biopsyMolecular diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID29496486
PMCPMC5857251
OpenAlexW2789913776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.