ArticleThe American journal of psychiatry2018
Molecular Genetic Analysis Subdivided by Adversity Exposure Suggests Etiologic Heterogeneity in Major Depression.
Article in The American journal of psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- The predictive value of polygenic risk scores for depression in gene-environment interaction studies: a systematic review.Translational psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Unraveling the associations between voice pitch and major depressive disorder: a multisite genetic study.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Analysis of genetic and clinical factors associated with buprenorphine response.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021Pooled it
- Context-specific genetic effects inform endotypes and treatment in asthma.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Choice of phenotype scale is critical in biobank-based G×E tests.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cell death pathways in the pathogenesis of depression: mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Heightened subcortical reactivity to uncertain-threat is associated with future internalizing symptoms, conditional on stress exposure.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Diversifying Psychiatric Genomics: Globally Inclusive Strategies Toward Health Equity.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Unraveling the Associations Between Voice Pitch and Major Depressive Disorder: A Multisite Genetic Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Polygenic Analyses Show Important Differences Between Major Depressive Disorder Symptoms Measured Using Various Instruments.Biological psychiatry · 2024Article
- Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of major depression aids locus discovery, fine mapping, gene prioritization and causal inference.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Stem cell therapy for the treatment of psychiatric disorders: a real hope for the next decades.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
- Applying an evolutionary mismatch framework to understand disease susceptibility.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- The genetic basis of major depressive disorder.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- Major Depressive Disorder and Oxidative Stress: A Review of Peripheral and Genetic Biomarkers According to Clinical Characteristics and Disease Stages.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Polygenic analyses show important differences between MDD symptoms collected using PHQ9 and CIDI-SF.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Genetic heterogeneity: Challenges, impacts, and methods through an associative lens.Genetic epidemiology · 2022Review
- Risk factor profiles for depression following childbirth or a chronic disease diagnosis: case-control study.BJPsych open · 2022Article
- Implication of Melanocortin Receptor Genes in the Familial Comorbidity of Type 2 Diabetes and Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe extent to which major depression is the outcome of a single biological mechanism or represents a final common pathway of multiple disease processes remains uncertain. Genetic approaches can potentially identify etiologic heterogeneity in major depression by classifying patients on the basis of their experience of major adverse events.
methodData are from the China, Oxford, and VCU Experimental Research on Genetic Epidemiology (CONVERGE) project, a study of Han Chinese women with recurrent major depression aimed at identifying genetic risk factors for major depression in a rigorously ascertained cohort carefully assessed for key environmental risk factors (N=9,599). To detect etiologic heterogeneity, genome-wide association studies, heritability analyses, and gene-by-environment interaction analyses were performed.
resultsGenome-wide association studies stratified by exposure to adversity revealed three novel loci associated with major depression only in study participants with no history of adversity. Significant gene-by-environment interactions were seen between adversity and genotype at all three loci, and 13.2% of major depression liability can be attributed to genome-wide interaction with adversity exposure. The genetic risk in major depression for participants who reported major adverse life events (27%) was partially shared with that in participants who did not (73%; genetic correlation=+0.64). Together with results from simulation studies, these findings suggest etiologic heterogeneity within major depression as a function of environmental exposures.
conclusionsThe genetic contributions to major depression may differ between women with and those without major adverse life events. These results have implications for the molecular dissection of major depression and other complex psychiatric and biomedical diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.